dolebirchwood

7 ms·

61.
by dolebirchwood 6mo ago
Thanks. That helps us know not to take Wiktionary seriously.
62.
by dolebirchwood 6mo ago
Because the latter's "business impact" is clearly made-up bull shit?
63.
by dolebirchwood 6mo ago
And when the distilled knowledge/product is the result of multiple prompts, revisions, and reiterations? Shall we send all 30+ of those as well so as to reproduce each step along the way?
64.
by dolebirchwood 6mo ago
With songs like "A Million Amelias"... millions, apparently.
65.
by dolebirchwood 6mo ago
Author should spend less time founding startups and more time working in government, then come back and post a retraction.
66.
by dolebirchwood 6mo ago
I think that's probably the crux of where there's conflict here. There was a time in my life where I definitely much more emotionally invested in the music listened to. I thought I'd definitely kill myself if I ever went deaf
67.
by dolebirchwood 6mo ago
[flagged]
68.
by dolebirchwood 6mo ago
It's a bit absurd that a semantic debate is happening over a term coined in someone's shower thought tweet. Maybe the real problem is that it's just a stupid phrase that should never have been taken so seriously. But here we
69.
by dolebirchwood 6mo ago
Sociopaths don't have much going for them in life other than winning status games.
70.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
I have a project where I'm using LLMs to parse data from PDFs with a very complicated tabular layout. I've been using the latest Gemini models (flash and pro) for their strong visual reasoning, and they've generally been doin
71.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
Is this a young people thing? I'm 40. I have never liked Shorts. What am I supposed to get out of 10 seconds of video? And all the sudden jump-cuts, and big obnoxious one-word-at-a-time subtitles... They're all literally unwatchab
72.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
My bad.
73.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
I've known people who survived multiple rounds of layoffs, not because they were "distinguished", but because they were the cheapest. Meanwhile, their more talented counterparts got the ax for being too expensive. Simple as t
74.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
Fuck off, robot.
75.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
Me: This is janky shit. Robot: You're right. The interface is raw. That's the point. We're not here to polish chrome. We're here to build things that matter. The browser is dead. We killed it. This is the Agent Experienc
76.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
The code is still clean and organized. When I say I don't care "how" the code is written, I mean I don't care how it was generated (i.e., by prompting or by hand -- and I don't do any of it manually anymore). I stil
77.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
I have three side projects that revolve around taking public access data from shitty, barely usable local government websites, and then using that data to build more intuitive and useful UIs around them. They're portfolio pieces, but a
78.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
All of which can already be done programmatically without OpenClaw.
79.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
> When you add many humans to a project, the result becomes greater than the sum of its parts. When you add many AI tools to a project, it quickly becomes a muddled mess. I have absolutely been on projects where there were too many cooks
80.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
Am I just supposed to know what "creative coding" is? It is not defined anywhere on the page. What specifically distinguishes "creative coding" from just "coding"?
81.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
The irony of your comment's tone is overwhelming.
82.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
Would you kindly leave a casual reply to my comment here just to prove you aren't an LLM? I'll compensate you with an upvote. Thanks, bro.
83.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
> You might bring suit against a police department or LE agency, but you'll fail to find any relief there. I don't know if I'd go so far to say she won't find any relief, but it probably still could be a pretty toug
84.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
> Oxford commas are a monstrosity This is objectively wrong.
85.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
> Voice-to-voice (thought-to-thought, maybe?) interaction with your coding agent — conversational Claude Code, not just voice-to-text input — is a natural next step. Maybe it's just me, but I don't see the appeal in verbal dict
86.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
He's not hostile; he's Dutch.
87.
by dolebirchwood 7mo ago
> it all starts with our EAGER values Sounds like something I'd expect to see on a banner in an elementary school classroom.
88.
by dolebirchwood 8mo ago
> AI can trivially be told to imitate that Soon there's only going to be one way to prove you're human online: Write with an eloquent combination of hate speech, racial slurs, and offensive language.
89.
by dolebirchwood 8mo ago
The best candidates would have that question wrapped up in 5 minutes. Like they're not even having to think about it, which is honestly all I cared about testing for -- do something really easy really fast so I know you're not BSi
90.
by dolebirchwood 8mo ago
> mid/difficult You're assuming the question has to even be that difficult. I've proctored sessions for senior-level webdev roles where the questions were akin to "baby's first React component" -- write a co

More ›