dolebirchwood

5 ms·

1.
by dolebirchwood 6d ago
People take photos with their cell phones instead of painting a scene like Rembrandt. They don't think they are a genius, and nobody cheers and claps. The photos look fine, they get the job done, and everyone moves on with their lives
2.
by dolebirchwood 6d ago
> But still, they were nice because you knew someone took the time to create them to promote an event Unlike a gift, "it's the thought that counts" doesn't fly with me here. I don't care how much effort the secre
3.
by dolebirchwood 8d ago
> who is getting sued when it is wrong? You. Don't take legal advice from a word calculator.
4.
by dolebirchwood 14d ago
I'll join you on the pitchforks. This is the most exciting moment in history.
5.
by dolebirchwood 21d ago
If you're browsing Reddit for its front page, yes, that's trash. But it can be a great source for getting information on narrow, specific topics on well-moderated subreddits filled with enthusiastic and obsessive people eager to s
6.
by dolebirchwood 21d ago
Gotta double-dip on those internet points.
7.
by dolebirchwood 24d ago
> enough for my needs Which are...?
8.
by dolebirchwood 25d ago
Probably because polite people are already in the habit of saying please when typing out requests in chat. We're not consciously thinking about it, regardless of whether a human or machine is on the other side.
9.
by dolebirchwood 25d ago
Don't worry - I'm paying for our friends overseas to keep their distilling operations going.
10.
by dolebirchwood 25d ago
> What makes you say it's LLM? Probably the usual "big words hard" mindset of people who aren't used to reading well-written prose.
11.
by dolebirchwood 1mo ago
I'm totally clueless, but aren't there rules requiring accessibility of public-facing government communications, to the extent that they shouldn't be allowed to use a gated platform when making official statements that are a
12.
by dolebirchwood 1mo ago
There were still meaningful lessons to take away. Your loss. Maybe feed the article to another AI to summarize so you'll feel less hoodwinked about someone passing off AI writing as their own?
13.
by dolebirchwood 1mo ago
> what if the companies factory explodes due to a mishap and takes out a few city blocks, is the company held liable Yes, but, generally, in the United States, they would be liable because their negligence caused the harm (giving rise
14.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
If you're on the DeepSeek Platform, you'd see this: "We plan to raise the overall pricing for DeepSeek API services in the near future, with a significant increase expected. Please plan your usage accordingly. The specific pr
15.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
Sure, based on predicate knowledge.
16.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
> what should be done about open weight bioweapon and cyber-offense capabilities? If the model is capable of it, then it was in the model's training data, which means it was on the internet or published in books made available for c
17.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
That's cool, but bear in mind that courts in the United States are generally required to be a little more lax in their enforcement of procedural rules when a party is pro se. Not saying you did make mistakes, but if you did, you may ha
18.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
> I'm just not sure it's worth it to argue with others about it at this point. This is the correct response. Let closed-minded people do their thing. Makes them less competitive against you. There's nothing for you to gain
19.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
People shouldn't have to explain that "Little Tech Association" is a proper noun and therefore its own entity. Learn how words work, bro.
20.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
A little bit of Googling goes a long way...
21.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
> miss spelled Good one.
22.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
I've subscribed to paid courses in the past, and sometimes the speaker's voice would be so off-putting that it would really drag down the quality of the experience (looking at you, Steve Kinney). I'd have paid extra to have a
23.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
One article... every time. And the only reason it gets any traction is because of who the author is -- not because of anything substantively useful. Do you think this whole "pelican on a bicycle" would have blown up if, say, you
24.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
Those shots all matched the banality of Uptown Funk's lyrics.
25.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
> What would you prefer it do? If it was up to me, an LLM should not be permitted to self-identify with words like "I", "me", "my", etc. An LLM should only be identified using system-centric labels like &quo
26.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
Why AI-generated? Because the quality of his writing is better than that of his critics?
27.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
>We have people here who use LLMs to raise their children, to manage relationships Anyone who's spent time in professions in or adjacent to social work would say that a lot of their clients would frankly be better off outsourcing th
28.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
> You would care about that story No, I wouldn't. I don't live in Seattle, and I don't care about octopi. Why project what you think a reader cares about?
29.
by dolebirchwood 2mo ago
> There is a difference: - There are people who do, - And there are those who criticize. Weird shield to hide behind, considering there are also people who can do both.
30.
by dolebirchwood 3mo ago
> This doesn't make sense Makes perfect sense to anyone good at using these models. What doesn't make sense is that analogy. Typing prompts isn't even close to as difficult to baking bread.

More ›