doldisod

3 ms·

1.
by doldisod 5y ago
lol. Your comments here make it pretty clear that you’re an ideologue who never intended to seriously engage with anyone anyway. You hate advertising, therefore everything about this article is evil regardless of how correct it may be from
2.
by doldisod 5y ago
First, who cares? This article isn’t about the consumers. Perhaps it would be great for the Netflix consumer if Netflix became a nonprofit? Second, why? Why would this be bad for the Netflix consumer. Consumers willing to pay current sub fe
3.
by doldisod 5y ago
The article specifically argues that they should do this in order to further grow their customer base, and retain customers that are unwilling to pay current prices. Why couldn’t they keep existing subscribers ad-free? Those people are curr
4.
by doldisod 5y ago
Highest tiers being the current tiers. The article also argues that Netflix is constantly bumping up their prices, and this would further justify that by making the higher tiers seem more attractive.
5.
by doldisod 5y ago
You’re joking, right?
6.
by doldisod 5y ago
> Similarly first time I see a youtube ad, I'll cancel my youtube premium subscription. Youtube has ads for the lower tiers, yet you’re still subscribed. This article is explicitly not arguing that Netflix should show ads to existin
7.
by doldisod 5y ago
> I read this and I’m honestly still not sure what Ben’s point is It’s in the title > Not to mention the clickbait title. Why do you think the title is clickbait? It accurately reflects the contents of the article.