dogleash

22 ms·

361.
by dogleash 2y ago
Apple has sterile attempts to pretend they're not sterile. And that's fine. That's all it has to be. Something aesthetically appealing and universally brandsafe. But it's not not-soulless. Have you ever read a F500 comp
362.
by dogleash 2y ago
> I don’t really understand the outrage over this stupid ad. The ad caused people to remember unresolved dissonance they're using media to avoid thinking about in the first place. An ad that was designed to emotionally manipulate pe
363.
by dogleash 2y ago
[deleted]
364.
by dogleash 2y ago
Comedy was hit hard by the broader online media shift from personalities to soulless "personalities." It feels like there's a big hollowed out void between hackneyed mass appeal, and full sending to absurdist and surreal come
365.
by dogleash 2y ago
> The internet is weakening and fracturing at intense speed - faster than it grew. The writing was on the wall a decade ago. You'll get Cable TV 2.0 and you'll like it. An army of sycophants and chumps are working to ensure i
366.
by dogleash 2y ago
Why do jounos treat mundane incremental automation progress as dystopian, while casting the dystopian tech paradigm shifts as mundane?
367.
by dogleash 2y ago
"Bring your whole self to work" meets "no, not like that" I just feel bad for the people entering the job market believing the lies. Yeah they're dummies if they thought anything else would happen. But all my scorn
368.
by dogleash 3y ago
The change is adding a NSFW tag. Seems like a way for people to find/avoid that content more easily depending on their taste. Why is the whole article dooming about adult media on twitter? Is there a porn problem that in all my twitt
369.
by dogleash 3y ago
Interesting thought. Perhaps the cat-and-mouse game of megacorps defending/expanding their turf through software/hardware boundaries isn't the best mechanism to achieve consumer protection. If only there was something like co
370.
by dogleash 3y ago
yea, it's possible to loose perspective on how much people can just go out and do in life, and how after-the-fact most of the systems that prevent it are. It seems like there is a predisposition to that perspective shift for people who
371.
by dogleash 3y ago
>Hallucinations are unlikely to occur twice in a row. So just ask twice. lol If it's not already easily googleable, the LLM will just spit out some boilerplate apology and then double down on the previous wrong answers, provide some
372.
by dogleash 3y ago
Apple is such boring stagnant soulless void, I don't know why people wouldn't want it chopped up just to see the component parts trying to innovate again. What have they done in the last few years? Minor incremental updates to exi
373.
by dogleash 3y ago
It'll shamble on forever. Look at the front page in a private tab right now. Yeah it's all dogshit content, but this is the product now. All the niche communities that made reddit good were dying a slow death well before any of t
374.
by dogleash 3y ago
The only thing I believe is that the hypothetical future I describe is a non-zero chance possibility. Everything else is the is/ought problem. I'm just talking about how prevailing attitudes change over time.
375.
by dogleash 3y ago
> Yeah, it was insane how long it took for developers to start taking transport security seriously. It's just the way life works. In 10 years it will be "insane" that your computer ever ran any unsigned code. 10 more years
376.
by dogleash 3y ago
Zero evidence? Can I skip the hour+ video and someone just explain here how the evidence didn't make it into court (I'm most curious about the Mt. Gox and Liberty Reserve accounts records)? Was it not even submitted, thrown out,
377.
by dogleash 3y ago
What part exactly? The worktrees? If you're just talking worktrees, the benefit is what it says on the tin, multiple parallel working directories. They're a nice to have, not world-changing or anything. The example in the article
378.
by dogleash 3y ago
> Young devs won't believe it Sure they would. They believe anything. I made up some nonsense one day that bytes weren't always 8 bits and they believed that shit.
379.
by dogleash 3y ago
Subcultures directly prior to the iPhone felt entirely mediated by movies, tv and advertisement. The boundaries they provided didn't match reality, they were flavors that people found themselves fit into, willing or not. But they were
380.
by dogleash 3y ago
https://twitter.com/Criminalsimpson/status/17542497367673571...
381.
by dogleash 3y ago
> Everyone already knew this was the case and having hard data around it was never going to change anything. See also: open offices. It's a con. Everyone knows it's a con. But it's one of those cons that get so big, every
382.
by dogleash 3y ago
Oh no, not lowbrow content! Anything but that!
383.
by dogleash 3y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_domain
384.
by dogleash 3y ago
> I'd argue high quality journalistic work is supremely valuable but it needs to be targeted Ok, sure, I can agree so far. > and lots of legacy news properties (NYT, The Guardian, etc) have been doing that And you've lost me
385.
by dogleash 3y ago
depends on your use case and requirements it's a source control tool, the whole purpose is file synchronization tailored to a specific use case
386.
by dogleash 3y ago
>I'd guess because there's a filesystem representation of the branch name happening in there. Yep, it works exactly how you're assuming. You're asking the filesystem to create a directory with the same name as an exis
387.
by dogleash 3y ago
>I wonder if this might be an educational issue? It certainly is. There are two things that a team needs to do to use git: 1) Team members all learn git 2) A few conventions are agreed upon to facilitate collaboration People use #2 to r
388.
by dogleash 3y ago
Journos' relationship with Twitter is a bunch of self-styled smart people that don't realize they're serious-posting about their version of discord mod drama.
389.
by dogleash 3y ago
rainymood.com
390.
by dogleash 3y ago
I don't understand what you're talking about. Reviewing code has nothing to do with what review tools or git verbs you use when remedying issues found in the code review. Code review is just applying a quality standard to the code

More ›