Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dogleash
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
271.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
> I think the original, parent comment was coming from a much more generous place. I don't. Equating questioning a piece with willful ignorance and a safe-to-hate caricature all smell of bile to me. "nerds too nerd to art"
272.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
Managementbrain's definition of a well rounded developer is also the definition of people they're trying to promote out of development. Then they look around at developers wondering why they all just don't "get it".
273.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
>or is people's ambivalence towards elite universities 100% irrational? am·biv·a·lence /amˈbiv(ə)ləns/ noun the state of having mixed feelings or contradictory ideas about something or someone. Ambivalence se
274.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
> I’ll go against the grain and say that fake deadlines are incredibly useful. If everyone's on board with your definition of deadline and it always works that way, then sure yeah whatever I'm not going to argue the point. But
275.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
> 3. Most people don't want to graduate from tribes to views I checked out of political conversations when I noticed I was teaching remedial civics over drinks and none of us were having fun. So I just sit back and watch people who
276.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
> What would you suggest. Hard work. From you.
277.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
Even with their recent privacy policy changes, Mozilla's approach is structurally different from Google's core business model. >This wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't that the entire brand identity of Firefox is Priva
278.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
Slackers have always existed. So the prudent line of thought is to question what purpose the "quiet-quit" terminology serves? The first thing I notice is that it replaces a description of behavior with an external assessment of a
279.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
Tell me you're a Cursor advertisement chatbot without telling me you're a Cursor advertisement chatbot.
280.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
I wish you the best of luck in fighting one buzzword with your new one. If it gains traction I'm sure it won't be used by the champions of your buzzword to sneak in their own desires instead of rigid adhereance to your definition
281.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
To me the biggest insight here is that no matter what data science you're trying to do on a group of employees, the people you already have decided should be fired or promoted from that group are outliers and should be removed from the
282.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
That's apocryphal, the name just lasted beyond the original workflow of a now 55 year old publishing system. The idea that a published RFC is a final word is a newer idea too. Yeah, you can't modify an RFC, you have to publish a
283.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
The same way you did it "in the age of the internet" and "in the age of TV" You largely don't. Of course you try to motivate them. And it does work on some, mostly out of fear of an authoritarian institution that&#
284.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
The compiler one read to me like a reminder to not ignore the lessons of compiler design. The premise being that even though you have small scope project compared to a "real" compiler, you will evolve towards analogues of those d
285.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
> The entire company colluding and lying to the public isn't "easy". Why not? Stop calling it "the entire company colluding and lying" and start calling it a "messaging strategy among the people not prevent
286.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
> very small niche website of again, mostly tech related westerners That's what they want. A social club with an overton window they like. It's designed for mass userbase so it can feel like a big party that "everybody&quo
287.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
>a perfect storm of economic, regulatory and industry factors has mostly blocked tech startups from “exiting" If that's what you want to call not building a profitable business, ok, you do you. It's fine to fail. The cloc
288.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
I'm pulling for you. However. Cultural attitudes are propagated by people who's livelihood is frequent publishing. In that scenario, I think teams "what's to talk about?" and "it's not that complicated&qu
289.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
> Americans won't buy cheap cars Not from a new car dealership, no. They'll buy cheap cars, but the mere act of driving a new car off the lot is a huge deprecation event in the life of the car. Why would price sensitive buyer
290.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
I was reaching for a descriptor and ended up riffing off 'quiet quitting' and 'quiet firing'. I understand you're not deprecating or recommending anything, and have learned in the meantime just how ugly python infig
291.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
Regardless of your intent, you didn't acknowledging the parent poster's concern about python overall. Just exculpated PyPI. I believe you would have received a much less pushback if you hadn't been coy about the obviously imp
292.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
>> PyPI package upload in favor of the trusted provider system. pip (or other tooling) will add warnings whenever I install a package that is not "trusted". Maybe I am simply pessimistic. > Let me put it this way: if PyPI
293.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
> Part of why sdists exist is so that people who can't trust the wheel, like distro maintainers, can build things themselves. Some might even expect pypi to build everything going into it's repo similar to a distro building for
294.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
> I believe we ask and expect too much of satire Yes, if you expect anything from satire you expect too much. Let it be art, not propaganda. Allow yourself to find poor execution of agreeable messages distasteful. Allow yourself to enjo
295.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
Oh come on now. The world wasn't just sent to live with it's auntie and uncle in Bel-Air. The distressed sullen worldview might be new to you, but people certainly had it back when I found the Onion regularly quite enjoyable too
296.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
Funny concept. Shame that The Onion's writing these days so mid.
297.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
Depends on the features you want.
298.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
> Even having the option of a hard spend limit would be hazardous, because accounting teams might push the use of such tools Tell me you're Shadow IT without telling me you're Shadow IT. I know legitimizing shadow IT is still t
299.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
An expert in the field can conduct an investigation into what is happening behind their back without also specializing in reverse engineering? That's supposed to be an improvement that makes it Kosher? Really?
300.
▲
by
dogleash
2y ago
You're not alone. Streaming services' selling point is access to the catalogue. Everything else about the product tends towards being aggressively mid.
More ›