dmg826

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   Marketing and Growth Lessons for Uncertain Times(cxl.com)

   1 points by dmg826 7y ago|0 comments
2. 2.▲
   What 15 CEOs Learned Building Top Agencies(conversionxl.com)

   2 points by dmg826 7y ago|0 comments
3. 3.▲
   How Much Do SaaS Companies Spend on Their MVPs?(conversionxl.com)

   2 points by dmg826 7y ago|0 comments
4. 4.▲
   by dmg826 7y ago

   It's still algorithm-first. It's not "learning data" in the sense that human ratings are used to train the algorithm. It's more of a check step. So, for example, if humans think one website is vastly more (or less)
5. 5.▲
   by dmg826 7y ago

   "Quality" is a really hard thing to define algorithmically. Even if you had great journalists on staff, I don't know if their heuristic expertise could translate to an algorithm. Most signals of trust/quality come via ba
6. 6.▲
   by dmg826 7y ago

   The human raters are used to assess the performance of the algorithms (i.e. do human opinions align with algorithmic ones), not to rank content directly. A recurring theme with Google is that they always want to solve problems algorithmical