dmead

59 ms·

691.
by dmead 11y ago
are the entwives the trees that are under his control? is that what happened to them?
692.
by dmead 11y ago
this is exactly the case. had i just remember what a power set was instead of say something dumb like "all the n-k combination of these children something someting" it would have gone much better. and yes, it was a hard tree quest
693.
by dmead 11y ago
i blew a google interview question because i failed to recognize a powerset. keeping up with this stuff is pretty important.
694.
by dmead 11y ago
this is totally true. IBM isn't really a technology company anymore. they're in the business of buying and selling smaller services companies. also expect compose to be totally different after about a year (source: i've worke
695.
by dmead 11y ago
no mention of ashton kutcher's day job as a tech investor.
696.
by dmead 11y ago
how opinionated. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisp_%28programming_language%2...
697.
by dmead 11y ago
we're sorry m8s
698.
by dmead 11y ago
that is static typing FUD. if it takes you a few days or weeks to learn to use the type checker and it saves you from expensive runtime errors later, then whats the problem?
699.
by dmead 11y ago
neat. you and the BeAim guy should have teamed up.
700.
by dmead 11y ago
what made you want to write kopete when gaim was still pretty popular? i remember kde switching over to use that as the default around 3.5 not understanding why people didn't like gaim/pidgin anymore.
701.
by dmead 11y ago
even back when they were called gaim, it only ever supported the minimal feature set you need to communicate with other people.
702.
by dmead 12y ago
where is the nun's letter?
703.
XUnit Is Not Unit Testing(anthonysciamanna.com)
1 points by dmead 12y ago|0 comments
704.
by dmead 12y ago
why are you qualifying it as "the apple store review team"? it's just apple. maybe people have trouble associating this kind of bad behavior because the branding is so strong? are you mind controlled?
705.
by dmead 12y ago
screenshots. thanks.
706.
by dmead 12y ago
GOD WHERE IS THE PICTURE IM FREAKING OUT
707.
by dmead 12y ago
the ragnarok beta got me re-interested in the old snes rpgs. good stuff.
708.
by dmead 12y ago
why would you need the ast? if given a large chunk of code to maintain i'll usually run doyxgen on it to generate the xmlish kind of chart that it makes. at least it gives me a roadmap to start, but it's not super great.
709.
by dmead 12y ago
this is a generalization. there are old liberals.
710.
by dmead 12y ago
correct. it's very basic. they would just take the vector of whatever object and keep with it for some amount of frames until the server disagrees with the client prediction. if you had high packet loss this could result in some strang
711.
by dmead 12y ago
the quake engine and moreso the mod called "unlagged" had a version of this. they would try to infer what an object's motion would be a few frames ahead of what's coming in from the network. the clients (iirc) would only
712.
by dmead 12y ago
there is no way this is not sensationalized.
713.
by dmead 13y ago
you've got the option. IIRC, q3 itself generally runs bytecode blobs rolled by ID and compiled with their speical tool to that does quakeC -> qvm. q3 based games generally have compiled dll or .so files that may or may not make exte
714.
by dmead 13y ago
this is dumb.
715.
by dmead 13y ago
why would you feel this need to mirror this?
716.
by dmead 13y ago
i fail to see why this matters.
717.
by dmead 13y ago
also a sax player. do those practice bag thingies even work? i'd rather just use my ewi if its really a time of day making actual sound is not allowed.
718.
by dmead 13y ago
maybe? i know in starcraft 2 there were several very good players who used cheats to claw their way to the very top of the ladder. but it's true that the vast majority of cheaters aren't very good. it just creates grief for most p
719.
by dmead 13y ago
in case anyone is interested, one of the dominant cheat providers seems to be this: http://www.deadc0deshop.net/ a cat and mouse game, but interesting nonetheless
720.
by dmead 13y ago
that policy is status quo at IBM

More ›