Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dkzlv
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
Better dynamic themes in Tailwind with OKLCH color magic
(evilmartians.com)
1 points
by
dkzlv
3y ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Google has 93% of searches in Europe and 88% in the US. If such a company refuses their services to somebody who is compliant with every single of their publicly shared rule, it's an abuse of their power. And an anti-trust issue. But I
3.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Among other sites Microsoft serves ads on DuckDuckGo, so if you're a privacy enthusiast, you'll probably see the ad :)
4.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
The problem with this policy is that we're nowhere near cryptocurrency exchanges. Not at all. We mentioned crypto because we allowed people to pay for our services using BTC or ETH, that is it! You're also allowed to pay using usu
5.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Oh, yeah, thanks, but those should not be applied to us. Probably. > For the purposes of this policy, we consider financial products and services to be those related to the management or investment of money and cryptocurrencies, includin
6.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
If you're interested in this, please reach me out at dan@safeapps.io. I need some more information to move it up in the backlog, maybe you could help us with that?
7.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Thanks! Most of our competitors say they have "strong encryption", but when you read the page it actually means they have SSL. Or that they use SHA256 for hashing the passwords. That is… disappointing.
8.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Author's here. It is a standard privacy policy generated by getterms.io. We have no data on you. You can read about our security model here ( https://safeapps.io/content/security ) and walk through our source code h
9.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Thanks for your support across the thread. It is kind of difficult to oppose to a lot of people screaming "scam" into your face :) > Nobody puts a history like Yeah, a bunch of people here told me we have a huge problem with co
10.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
I am afraid this it what I will have to do. Small rebranding, new domain, fresh IP, new card, etc. Still it's hard to understand this decision.
11.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
> Why isn't it possible to make a new ad if the first one was rejected ? I don't fully understand how it played out. The whole account was banned, that's why. The ad actually passed the moderation and even had 200 impressi
12.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
I, the author, submitted it an hour before :) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27812051 I'll never understand how HN works, honestly.
13.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Thanks for the support. It's hard to defend against all the people that keep screaming to my face that I'm the scam here. > Google's financial services advertising page Can you give me the link? > It's also worth n
14.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Author's here. Yes, that is true and was the big red flag for me. I believe it would be in their best interest to exchange the data on potential fraudsters, because it would make their life simpler.
15.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Your input is invaluable, thanks. Honestly, I appreciate it I see that your comment got the most upvotes here, so it IS what I needed to hear. At least I won't need to change a lot in the product itself as it actually has a rather bori
16.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
> screams "my first time playing with CSS", not "you should trust us with your $$". Lol :) Thanks for your honest feedback! The app looks more traditional, btw. ( https://imgur.com/a/KabWkNS ) Base
17.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Hi! Author's here. Hell, it's AN INNOVATION I came up with — or at least so I thought I thought most people would be able to see this name instantly BECAUSE of the brackets, lol. Thanks for your sympathy, I appreciate it.
18.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Hi! Author's here. We submitted multiple appeals, but they were all declines — presumably, by real humans. I appreciate your feedback on the copy though. I guess, no harm in trying.
19.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Hi! Author's here. > On the other hand, this post talks about having a similar response from Microsoft, and those companies didn't collude As I wrote, I got the ban from Microsoft minutes after Google even before I created an a
20.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Hi! I'm the author. 1. it's hard to judge about that right away. It would be cool to see the ads data beforehand. If I saw the ad performs poorly I would change it obviously. "[safe] money" is our brand, so it would be s
21.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Is it a scam to charge a price for a product? We're freemium. You're not forced to get a subscription right away. You can even use the product without it at all. > there appears to be no way for you to self-host the service at
22.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
What is it that you don't like about the design? I just tried not to follow the common guidelines for the design and make the design more… developer friendly?
23.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Hi there! I'm the founder of this app. > After reading it a third time, I realize I guess it's just an open-source version of Mint? Well, not a great sigh for us, but at least… you guessed right! > But the author provides ze
24.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Hi, I'm the author. That was my first thought, but the problem is that the site was moderated by actual human beings and all the appeals were still denied. > Many similar companies run ads on Google all the time Like I said in the e
25.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Hi there! I'm the founder of this app. It's very upsetting that you found us scam-alike. It was never meant to be this way. If anything, we're trying to be the opposite: we open-sourced the whole app, we do not ask for your e
26.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
At first I was afraid to open news, but hey, it's not that similar! There's a competitor of mine called everydollar. They have the same similarity, lol.
27.
▲
Visualization of Starlink Satellites Density
(platform.leolabs.space)
3 points
by
dkzlv
5y ago
|
0 comments
28.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
It will have the full dataset and all features. Whatever you expect from a real offline mode :)
29.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Ooooh, I get it! “Upload” is a bad word for that. Will change it to something else, thanks!
30.
▲
by
dkzlv
5y ago
Oh, I see. OFX/CSV files are processed on the client-side, and we never get the raw file, only the processed and encrypted transactions. Does that make sense?
More ›