djur

21 ms·

271.
by djur 3y ago
I agree with you on the importance of Chevron deference, but I can't see any court getting to the second step of Chevron with this particular ruling, so no deference would be required. The legislation bans "artificial or prerecord
272.
by djur 3y ago
The language of the bill here, "artificial or prerecorded voice" isn't even ambiguous to a normal person. An AI agent's voice is undeniably "artificial". It'd be a much bigger stretch for the FCC to interp
273.
by djur 3y ago
Chevron was ruled in 1984 but it was a codification of principles that had already been in practice. It was a standard Supreme Court ruling, a formalization of precedent. After all, some degree of deference to executive interpretation is re
274.
by djur 3y ago
It's not a legal precedent, it's an interpretation of a law that they are mandated to enforce.
275.
by djur 3y ago
Those voices were already prohibited. This ruling specifically addresses agents "emulating human speech and interacting with consumers as though they were live human callers when generating voice and text messages". Based on the (
276.
by djur 3y ago
The controlling legislation here, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, prohibits initiating "any telephone call to any residential telephone line using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message without the prior
277.
by djur 3y ago
The ruling specifically only applies to the initiator of the call. IVR is not covered. Automated calls are also permitted with consent (for instance, if you sign up for notifications for filled prescriptions or backordered library books). I
278.
by djur 3y ago
When have we seen that pattern before?
279.
by djur 3y ago
Isn't it "Arm" because it's British and Brits typically write pronounceable acronyms in proper noun case (e.g. "Nato" vs. "UN")?
280.
by djur 3y ago
Just now I moved the mouse to hover over "Reply" while I was still reading the comment. It was close enough to where my eyes were focusing that I could put the pointer over it, but I never looked at it directly. I've noticed
281.
by djur 3y ago
The comment said "transcribe the floor plan", and this distinction is relevant because there are multiple options for robot vacuum cleaners without cameras.
282.
by djur 3y ago
Right, and goto is still used regularly in production code.
283.
by djur 3y ago
Learning those specific environments and stacks will take more effort than learning however much Python is necessary for them.
284.
by djur 3y ago
Are you opposed to libel laws?
285.
by djur 3y ago
I find that kind of "feature" frustrating as well, but I'm pretty certain that the reason it's there is that otherwise they get a constant deluge of support requests from people who forgot they turned it off.
286.
by djur 3y ago
An app I use regularly and have introduced numerous people to uses a small toggle slider next to text that reads "Yes, [enable this feature]". Both I and literally every person I have introduced the app to have made the mistake of
287.
by djur 3y ago
EDIT: I take this back. I think it's "forkability"; their description specifically points out that this shape is long enough to be easily picked up with a fork. Radiatori are pretty small and often easier to spoon. I like the
288.
by djur 3y ago
When you say it was "rejected", are you saying you received a message saying it was rejected, or it didn't appear on the site, or it was removed? I see a number of less-than-5-star reviews citing both of the flaws you mention
289.
by djur 3y ago
It's not fine. It's become a cesspit and virtually every new development over the past year has been to the detriment of its users.
290.
by djur 3y ago
They just had a very high-profile event involving deepfake porn of one of the world's most popular musical artists. They appear to have belatedly responded to this by shutting down all searches of that famous artist's name. This d
291.
by djur 3y ago
> Entity Component which is superior for many coders In what way?
292.
by djur 3y ago
Making piracy more difficult, primarily.
293.
by djur 3y ago
Sure, which is why my post started with a long list of the ways that the Animal Crossing world doesn't resemble our own. I guess the main point I'm trying to make is that you can't really see Animal Crossing as depicting even
294.
by djur 3y ago
In the real world, there's no amount of work that someone employed in data entry or fruit picking etc. can do that will give them the wealth, lifestyle or prestige of the CEO that runs their company. There are no idle rich in Animal Cr
295.
by djur 3y ago
The economic elements of Animal Crossing can be understood as a solution to a natural problem of a game featuring item collection: what do you do with excess collected items? How do you ensure the player feels like the main gameplay activit
296.
by djur 3y ago
Animal Crossing is also a game where natural resources are infinite and not rivalrous, alienation of labor is impossible, the labor theory of value dominates, and comparative advantage doesn't exist. You make money by personally extrac
297.
by djur 3y ago
Have anthropologists found any economies that don't involve conquest that aren't subsistence hunting + gathering?
298.
by djur 3y ago
Seems like OP didn't save me a click, then. Dang.
299.
by djur 3y ago
Bluesky doesn't have ads.
300.
by djur 3y ago
Why would someone encode words for a weather forecast?

More ›