djdyyz

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by djdyyz 2y ago

   Anyone can fake a website. Can you prove that they show the real Neuralink website?
2. 2.▲
   by djdyyz 2y ago

   It's actually amazing that Neuralink can use this badly distorted data. I imagine that fixing the A/D would improve their results dramatically -- lower latency and higher precision. Why Neuralink has continued work with such an ob
3. 3.▲
   by djdyyz 2y ago

   Bogus. But a nice spoof.
4. 4.▲
   by djdyyz 2y ago

   Analyzing the data it becomes clear that the A/D used by Neuralink is defective, i.e. very poor accuracy. The A/D introduces a huge amount of distortion, which in practice manifests as noise. Until this A/D linearity problem
5. 5.▲
   by djdyyz 2y ago

   Neuralink should skip the compression, and replace the radio link with optics. A tiny embedded LED can transmit data optically at the required speed, without compression, and a second transceiver outside the body, with access to more room,
6. 6.▲
   by djdyyz 2y ago

   Check out this link for background info. https://mikaelhaji.medium.com/a-technical-deep-dive-on-elon-...
7. 7.▲
   by djdyyz 2y ago

   Sorry, corrected an error. It's 2275X That's the compression ratio for complete cross correlation. It's (10 bits uncompressed / 4.5 bits compressed on 1 channel) * 1024 channels
8. 8.▲
   by djdyyz 2y ago

   200X is possible. The sample data compresses poorly, getting down to 4.5 bits per sample easily with very simple first-order difference encoding and an decent Huffman coder. However, lets assume there is massive cross-correlation between th