directoron

2 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by directoron 2mo ago

   That's a weak ad hominem deflection. Readers be the judge.
2. 2.▲
   by directoron 2mo ago

   Yes, the argument is MLKEM is so dangerous that it shouldn't be used alone. Even its codesigner says so. Why is it so hard to accept? Take a look at the crypto from the 80's and 90's. They are considered bad jokes nowadays, b
3. 3.▲
   by directoron 2mo ago

   The argument from Roberto Avanzi is reasonable: "as a codesigner of ML-KEM myself I would not trust using it exclusively: what if it gets broken mathematically and in the classical computational model (I.e. non-quantum)? Hybrid is bett