diputsmonro

18 ms·

1. 181.▲
   by diputsmonro 5y ago

   The same author has written articles about "scientific censorship" regarding covid vaccines and ivermectin treatments. This site screams "alternative facts" to me.
2. 182.▲
   by diputsmonro 5y ago

   This is not all "science's" fault. This whole thing has been political from the beginning, both in that those in power during the initial outbreak tried to downplay the dangers, and those opposing them tried to overcompensate
3. 183.▲
   by diputsmonro 5y ago

   It's easy to innovate and put in the hard work to do things efficiently when you have more money than God. Wealth begets wealth.
4. 184.▲
   by diputsmonro 5y ago

   > I disagree with the notion that a more equitable society is a silver bullet for reducing human misery. Surely it would not solve every source of human misery, but I don't see how it wouldn't be a substantial improvement. &
5. 185.▲
   by diputsmonro 5y ago

   Conversely, the "Great Awokening" is a direct result of the legitimate "democratization" that the article discusses. It seems to me that the knee-jerk opposition to "wokeness" always comes from people who would
6. 186.▲
   by diputsmonro 5y ago

   To be frank, "I don't like politics" is a privileged position that can only be held by people who are already so well-served by the current shape of the world that they have no strong desire - or rather, need - to change it.