3 ms·
Conversely, the "Great Awokening" is a direct result of the legitimate "democratization" that the article discusses. It seems to me that the knee-jerk oppositi
by diputsmonro 5y ago
Conversely, the "Great Awokening" is a direct result of the legitimate "democratization" that the article discusses.
It seems to me that the knee-jerk opposition to "wokeness" always comes from people who would rather sweep problems that don't affect them under the rug than acknowledge that they need to be fixed. They are the aloof, socially normative people in this article, utterly confused by and thus dismissive of the struggles of those outside of society's standard ingroup.
"We weren't like this 10 years ago" because, as the article describes, those concerns were previously ignored by the mainstream because they didn't fit the experiences or interests of those who had influence over the mainstream. Now that those institutions have lost that filtering power, we're hearing from more real people with more real problems. Healthcare access, structural racism, mental health resources, poverty, etc. They are taking their little hammers to our Twitter feeds. The solution isn't to shame and ignore the people complaining about them - it is to fix those societal issues that cause the pain to begin with.
- inglor_cz 5y agoOn the contrary, "structural racism" seems to me an almost religious, simple explanation (akin to "sin", "wickedness" or "the Devil") that papers over a much more complicated and nuanced situation. There is a massive hodgepodge of ethnic communities in the U.S., of all possible colors, and their societal and economic outcomes do not conform or correlate to the idea that people of darker skin are more oppressed by the society and are worse off.