dinfuehr

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by dinfuehr 2y ago

   I see. Thanks for the answers btw! I get your point but a few gaps here and there likely don't matter at all for performance. At least it's a lot better than making everything super compact all the time. Assuming you are splitting
2. 2.▲
   by dinfuehr 2y ago

   > The GC has to now move every object remaining in the vector down a step to make the vector dense again Is there something which forces you to compact everything here? Or could you do what most GCs do and track that free entry in a free
3. 3.▲
   by dinfuehr 2y ago

   Would this mean that each shape/structure/map get its own vector for each field in order for this to work?