diekdnk

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by diekdnk 6y ago

   Since the target audience was rhe unemployed, changing up their type of income isn't going to give them a job, so prpductivity is difficult to measure. The entire point of UBI is to secure everyones basic human needs, not get them a jo
2. 2.▲
   by diekdnk 6y ago

   The test was conducted by a popular right wing party "Kokoomus", which is heavily opposed to the system. This might affect the design of the test
3. 3.▲
   by diekdnk 6y ago

   No country's alike, and no system can be copied naively. (also Finland isn't part of Scandinavia)
4. 4.▲
   by diekdnk 6y ago

   There is no money added, it comes from other systems it replaces
5. 5.▲
   by diekdnk 6y ago

   The experiment was terribly flawed in that it only addressed the unemployed, and it didn't affect the existing unemployment system for them, making incentives perverse for all taking part. The UBI was offered tax-free on top. It repres