didibus

45 ms·

751.
by didibus 3y ago
The CRTC policies and regulations aim to promote access, representation and availability of media content by and for minority language communities. But it does not directly control or pre-approve the messages or creative content itself. The
752.
by didibus 3y ago
Can you explain what is indirect censorship? I personally don't know why people fear anything here. All you have to do to comply is add some Canadian content to your platform and recommend it and promote it in listings. You don't
753.
by didibus 3y ago
I'm not sure if they're going after a single podcast show, or after podcast apps. If the latter, it's probably just making available Canadian made podcasts to some amount of Canadian made podcast and promoting them in recomme
754.
by didibus 3y ago
Can someone explain to me how they get these graphs? What exactly are they measuring in the model execution?
755.
by didibus 3y ago
From what I know, it's just that you need a specified amount of air time from Canadian, French and indigenous presenters. What they choose to do with it is up to them. It's more of a pass the mic around so every group gets some ai
756.
by didibus 3y ago
I normally heard "nobody regrets not working more" in the context of work that has bad or no ROI. For example, lots of people work themselves to burnout by not taking all their vacations, returning to work very soon after their ch
757.
by didibus 3y ago
I haven't read the book, so I feel I can't give it an honest criticism, but I'm assuming the book isn't so much about what the "peasant" or "teenager" would do with AI, but more what smaller unstable
758.
by didibus 3y ago
AI alone, but logically AI eventually combines with capabilities from robotics, or is able to reach into auto-pilots of cars and planes, drones, self-manned turrets, missile controls, etc. No?
759.
by didibus 3y ago
Daniel Shiffman is on the Processing Board of Directors though. He is one of four member of the board. So I'd assume to some extent he's part of the disagreement with where the money is spent, but that's speculation, cause Be
760.
by didibus 3y ago
It's rarely luck alone, off course, someone has to have the guts to play, to risk losing something, and often must put in the work too. But out of everyone who does, luck can often make the winners. That said, in his case, there's
761.
by didibus 3y ago
The interesting part is: > I was soon shocked to learn that the Foundation spent nearly $800,000 last year. $0 of that went to Processing 4. [...] This year, the proposed Foundation budget is around $1.2 million. But for Processing, ther
762.
by didibus 3y ago
Damn, that's what? Do I need an MBA to understand why they'd need to spend on consultants and merchant processing fees?
763.
by didibus 3y ago
The criticism seemed pretty clear. He said that last year 800k was spent, and none of it went into development of Processing itself. And that next year they plan to spend 1.2 million, and of that, only 2 developers are planned to spend any
764.
by didibus 3y ago
Then you'd need a test for relevancy. Otherwise people could show correlation studies or data, or even stereotypes could be considered relevant.
765.
by didibus 3y ago
I don't think it's unachievable by others, but it's probably not achievable exclusively from following a template or immitating a play book. This in turn means that articles, books, seminars that provide a template or a play
766.
by didibus 3y ago
As a parent, I can only imagine one thing worst than someone causing such head injury to my child, it is for me to be falsely convicted of such abuse and losing access to my own child.
767.
by didibus 3y ago
I remember reading of a theory that kind of said that in any large enough random set, over long periods of time, you can identify clusters which will have consistent and predictable behaviors, but only within the bounds of the cluster and f
768.
by didibus 3y ago
Maybe, but LLM are trivial to integrate, it does not take any special knowledge or experience. Integrating in-house trained models is difficult, but LLMs really changes that.
769.
by didibus 3y ago
Their hiatus on the whole greed thing appart, I think they meant the same as what you said? That there's no lessons to learn, because doing the same thing again wouldn't work. And if even the person who succeeded first hand would
770.
by didibus 3y ago
I'm also wondering if it'll impact compensation in any way, as the work becomes easier and more accessible, I'd expect the pay will lower, since more people will be able to do the job with the help of AI.
771.
by didibus 3y ago
I'm guessing some actions that could be interpreted as abusive, could to some extent have been random. But internal communications tell you if they were random or planned out. I think that maybe goes for going after the decision makers
772.
by didibus 3y ago
Even if say the manager round robinned through the team?
773.
by didibus 3y ago
What I would have liked to see as an experiment is a bus being driven similar to an Uber share. Instead of being on a fixed route, what if it picked up and dropped off people exactly where they are, with routes optimized by the algorithms.
774.
by didibus 3y ago
I really don't see the issue with your happiness split. You have 10 people, and they're are equally unhappy. This is perfect, because now they are all equally incentivized to do something about it. They're motivated to work t
775.
by didibus 3y ago
This is an interesting take.. But you know what, thinking about it, I might prefer having n:1s where it's the whole team together. A kind of team level all-hands, but much more personal as well. Discuss what everyone has done, their ca
776.
by didibus 3y ago
I like the concept that there are accidental complexity and essential complexity. Essential complexity is that of the problem you are solving itself. How complex the use case itself is. Accidental complexity is how more complicated your imp
777.
by didibus 3y ago
It depends. In private companies it can be the CEO, or the CEO can be the owner who sets it's own comp. But generally yes, it's the board of directors, but rarely without input from the CEO. So it's not uncommon for CEOs to h
778.
by didibus 3y ago
I still don't see what goes beyond what I said. I do find it strange to call it an "ideology", but I guess if you want to say that. It still seems to me it's just debating the idea that people who want to dress, act, and
779.
by didibus 3y ago
> there is the belief that 'identifying' as a women makes you a women Do you mean that you do not believe that anyone has a brain chemistry that makes them feel like either they have the wrong gendered body or like they're
780.
by didibus 3y ago
> But claiming you are now a man makes no sense That's the point. Your conceptualization of gender doesn't actually make sense to the true reality of gender expression. You have this idea that gender "should" be some

More ›