di4na

35 ms·

451.
by di4na 7y ago
i did not say it was rejected. I said the community lost the momentum to work on it. Mostly because it felt nearly impossible to get return on perf. When people had momentum to do it last time, we were never able to get perf numbers and to
452.
by di4na 7y ago
no i disagree with go being good at concurrency and being good for web stuff for the go example. It is one of the worse experience i know. It is like trying to use C to do it.
453.
by di4na 7y ago
The default phoenix guide are really good and should be understandable if you come from php. https://hexdocs.pm/phoenix/overview.html The default elixir-lang getting started is pretty good. https://elixir-la
454.
by di4na 7y ago
critical idk. But i can answer your points against. What if you did not have to choose ? It gives you all of that. There is no "steep learning curve". I had a sysadmin that never did anything functional pushing code to prod in les
455.
by di4na 7y ago
By every real production load we know. Techempower have not been representative of anything. The only reason elixir and phoenix is not higher is because their code is buggy and they discouraged the community to try to fix it.
456.
by di4na 7y ago
This work tend to happen at a lower level, ie in erlang. Check Lasp https://lasp-lang.readme.io/ and its Partisan distribution networking strategies.
457.
by di4na 7y ago
Sydney Dekker "The Field Guide to Understanding 'Human Error'"
458.
Inhumanity of Root Cause Analysis(verica.io)
1 points by di4na 7y ago|0 comments
459.
by di4na 7y ago
That is not what the research shows. Quite the contrary
460.
by di4na 7y ago
I can not advise something more strongly than the Etsy's Debriefing Facilitation Guide. https://codeascraft.com/2016/11/17/debriefing-facilitation-g... This come from the field of Resiliency Engineering,
461.
by di4na 7y ago
As an admin of the elixir slack, i have to handle that one a lot. It is not really realistic at all no. But mostly because the benchmark is not realistic of a production load. That said we should do better. The main reason it is not fixed i
462.
by di4na 7y ago
I think my point is more that i am not focusing on these at all :) But the interest in these is more visible because we can modify them and build experiment in them.
463.
by di4na 7y ago
Well elixir explicitly try to not move away from the erlang paradigm and to be fully and "naturally" inter-operable with it. It is far more integrated with erlang than Scala is with Java as an example. It is basically erlang with
464.
by di4na 7y ago
Linked to a good starting point here. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20382694
465.
by di4na 7y ago
linked to a good starting point here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20382694
466.
by di4na 7y ago
Linked to a good starting point at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20382694
467.
by di4na 7y ago
A good starting point is https://github.com/lorin/resilience-engineering/blob/master/... My email is in my profile if you want to go deeper :)
468.
by di4na 7y ago
Interestingly, i promise you they do not use a so narrow definition. Dr Richard Cook is one of the leading researcher in this particular space. His definition of "complex system" is used here indeed in that wikipedia definition yo
469.
by di4na 7y ago
Coming from Eve Online, it is even older :D. I have no problem with the downvote. What matters is to do it.
470.
by di4na 7y ago
o7
471.
by di4na 7y ago
Failure handling. Load profile is slower but far smoother, it degrades far more nicely. It can handle stateful things and distributed systems far nicer, with a programming model that is really adapted to it.
472.
by di4na 7y ago
speed. A hot code upgrade can deploy a whole cluster in a few seconds. Plus it can keep states safe without rebalancing.
473.
by di4na 7y ago
Yes, basically it does not. It is up to the NIF packager to package a working way to handle that.
474.
by di4na 7y ago
Thanks Robert Virding http://rvirding.blogspot.com/2008/01/virdings-first-rule-of-...
475.
by di4na 7y ago
I would like to point out that it is not only the company but the person behind Devise (ie José Valim). It may means, possibly, that they are not really a fan of what was created with Devise and think the experiment should not be replicated
476.
by di4na 7y ago
Keep in mind that this salary for the US do not count in healthcare and pension that the UK nurse is entitled to. I know it may feel like a nitpick, but it does make a huge difference when you add that cost of living.
477.
by di4na 7y ago
Yep exactly.
478.
by di4na 7y ago
Anything out of Mission Control during Apollo. The Army has good stuff too. FEMA has some good stuff on how they apply it on the ground and train. I particularly like Gene Kranz "Failure is not an Option". It is more background bu
479.
by di4na 7y ago
It is not surprising at all. Mission Control was forged in the fire (literally for Apollo 1) and they are one of the most visible "incident team" we know about. I highly advise to read Gene Kranz memoirs "Failure is not an Op
480.
by di4na 7y ago
This is not a joke, because the European Agencies believe in teaching and learning more than in punishing. What they want is compliance, not making money. They will give you warning and time to fix it more than fine you. A fine is solution

More ›