di4na

31 ms·

391.
by di4na 6y ago
It is. Farmbot, System76, LeTote, some naval systems, etc etc. Frank do a good overview of "known" projects in the second part of this talk https://youtu.be/bkLABs04k5o?t=1173
392.
by di4na 6y ago
I regularly try to go read the specs. They are not built for consumption by end users and it shows. They are mostly legal documents describing all the edge cases. They have ton of fluff. Near no usable example. Are super hard to know which
393.
by di4na 6y ago
This judgement also validated SCC. Basically they are ok because they are underpinned by "the receiver country need to have proper privacy protections". So the SCC is legit. You just can't use it with the US.
394.
by di4na 6y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BEAM_(Erlang_virtual_machine)
395.
by di4na 6y ago
I understand it. That change nothing to the fact it is a shit UX, that does not help you to learn it and have relatively bad errors messages.
396.
by di4na 6y ago
Yes. Nearly everything on top of the BEAM. Oracle Cloud seems honestly to go in the right direction. And it pains me to say it. Hnoeycomb is a great tool built in a way that make sense. Gitless is a good progress over git. There are lot of
397.
by di4na 6y ago
I never said that it was not useful or that it was not better than any of the competitor solutions. Just that it was bad. It can be quite bad in itself and totally better than every other solution.
398.
by di4na 6y ago
Git. The UX and design is broken af, nothing work, noone get it. AWS. I don't know where to begin. Nothing make sense. Nothing works. Docker. This thing is basically backward at every step. We should have never packaged different thing
399.
by di4na 6y ago
Git. AWS.
400.
by di4na 6y ago
Nope that is illegal too. Basically anything that makes you want to just rage close it is illegal. The trick noone seems to understand is that this is not about getting your consent. It is about making things that cannot get your consent in
401.
by di4na 6y ago
Technically if they do that, they are illegal.
402.
by di4na 6y ago
Same, tbh i can't really. Usually maths end up on a whiteboard or paper.
403.
by di4na 6y ago
Nope. Tbh i do not dream a lot. But even in dreams, it is all about abstract things that move around me.
404.
by di4na 6y ago
Still blank with the concept
405.
by di4na 6y ago
I can draw you a dog, but if you ask me to picture a ball on a table, i do not picture anything specific. It is just the abstract idea of a ball on the table. It does not have colour, substance, space, nothing.
406.
by di4na 6y ago
Qualcomm is also nowhere near a startup or a fledgling SMB
407.
by di4na 6y ago
There is a lot of interest, but EU DPA far prefer trying to educate and move the needle slowly than hit a lot of companies, killing them. I would point out that, if not for Covid, the UK DPA had planned to kill multiple adtech company durin
408.
by di4na 6y ago
There are already 2 text coming that significantly change it. Mostly to make it more protective. Search for "ePrivacy". On top of that, there is a wide range given to the DPA which they are using. It is just that the EU agencies p
409.
by di4na 6y ago
Nope. If it is annoying, then it is not an informed consent acceptable opt-in because you are pushed into accepting to make it go away.
410.
by di4na 6y ago
Yes, that is called a model. Usually people that study complexity will say that all models are wrong but some are useful. In software, we usually prefer the term abstraction. The trick is to remember that our model are wrong. This gap betwe
411.
by di4na 6y ago
Not really but he would be right if he did. He argues that deep down the goal of the machine is to take decisions in humans contexts. Which by definition only can make sense for a human. Ofc we can argue about a fictional theoretical human
412.
by di4na 6y ago
there are things in it to punish people abusing the system too
413.
by di4na 6y ago
I still don't understand what you are talking about, but i suppose this is more due to my own limitations in missing a lot of the background you come from. Sorry that i am not that useful :(
414.
by di4na 6y ago
I am not sure i understand the problem you are trying to find information about. Maybe explain it a little bit more ? or go ask for it in the elixir forum, people can try to be your librarians there
415.
by di4na 6y ago
Make this 100k and we can maybe begin to look at a research project for a prototype that noone will use. Make it 1M and we can make something that works maybe for you. Make it 10M and we can make it work for one version of OTP in a few year
416.
by di4na 6y ago
Thank you Rachel for saying loud what the erlang community say for years :) This is basically the erlang design. And yes it works really well.
417.
by di4na 6y ago
I have to say this is spot on. The move of things like the Culture spacecraft names into wikia was a killing blow, particularly due to the use of ... dubious... cookies and tracking on wikia. And while i understand the feeling this does not
418.
by di4na 6y ago
A slight point on Erlang: Erlang is good on business logic and not really good on making something "mathematically nice". It is more in the same place than the one you give to Go/Rust. Low latency good performance and great r
419.
by di4na 7y ago
Hmm I would say try to read Erlang in Anger, test it in a toy app, that is not hard to get. https://www.erlang-in-anger.com/ This is also a good entry point https://medium.com/@mrjoelkemp/jvm-struggles-
420.
by di4na 7y ago
I meant about the debugging tools that OTP ship with. There is nothing in this about messages or function tracing dynamically. Even less about the kind of introspection you get with it. I totally agree with your points, i am just pointing t

More ›