dhqgekt

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by dhqgekt 11mo ago

   Reminds me of Gell-Mann amnesia and nobelitis; cognitive biases in general.
2. 2.▲
   by dhqgekt 1y ago

   I am not an expert in any of the relevant disciplines, but I've some ideas, I don't know how right or wrong they are. A conscious being should have an internal model of the observable external world, and given the means, it should
3. 3.▲
   by dhqgekt 1y ago

   I am asking about the core language implementation. No need to publish the whole source code of HN, just the part of source code of clarc.. You do not have "anti-abuse measures" in the language implementation and runtime, do you?
4. 4.▲
   by dhqgekt 1y ago

   When we will get to see the code of clarc? I hope that there is no "business logic" relevant to running HN in the language implementation, is there?
5. 5.▲
   by dhqgekt 1y ago

   Youtuber PolyMatter has very recently made a video about exactly this topic: https://youtu.be/bThPluSzlDU
6. 6.▲
   by dhqgekt 2y ago

   If you like the Ruby syntax (but want a statically typed language), you might want to take a look at Crystal: https://crystal-lang.org/ > Crystal is statically typed and type errors are caught early by the compiler, elim
7. 7.▲
   by dhqgekt 3y ago

   Here's another cage to consider: language. We are limited in what we can think by the language we use. There are infinite things expressible using language, but still, doesn't it seem like there's ''stuff'&#x27