Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dgroshev
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
241.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
> In your scenario, Alice already decided not to buy anything from AcmeShop. Not really, that's exactly what "remarketing" ads are for — companies track people's interest and remind them of their products. However, in
242.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
I suspect the latter part is so commonplace that many technologists don't even think twice about it. > Unilaterally imposing unfair trading conditions on other online classified ads service providers who advertise on Meta's pla
243.
▲
The Sane Rendering Manifesto [video]
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
dgroshev
2y ago
|
0 comments
244.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
Would you ever see footage of them not hitting weak spots?
245.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
> a low-yield device over the Black Sea or the North Sea How is it different? What "panic reactions"? What "panic reaction" can connect a low-yield explosion over Black Sea and a suicidal strategic strike on the conti
246.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
> an entirely possible provocation that could shove things in that direction How? What plausible pathway do you see between Russia exploding a nuke over Novaya Zemlya and their suicide by American nuclear response? > A major shift in
247.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
I don't think there is any conceivable scenario in which Russia using nuclear weapons would lead to anything resembling "World War", except Russia launching a counter-value strike against continental US, which is just not hap
248.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
> you don't put a nuke somewhere to kill people; you put it there to destroy infrastructure. More specifically nuclear missile silos, and bomb shelters (well, the people inside them.) It depends. "Counter-force" strikes ai
249.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
There is no fear of WWIII, that's part media invention, part political excuse, part useful idiots. A "World War" requires an opponent worthy of a world-wide conflict, and Russia is anything but, being stuck in Ukraine for thr
250.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
Note that FPV drones in Ukraine are not squad-level, there are separate drone units (at the very least 2 operators, at least 1 explosives guy because arming drones with makeshift explosives is not trivial and super risky, plus cover). Plus
251.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
I agree wholeheartedly (and I'm not surprised that you of all people often write raw futures!). I want to push back on the "async rust bad/failure/not ready" meme because - it's perfectly possible to be a succe
252.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
Every single JS future is boxed. Moreover, they aren't just boxed, they are often backed by a hashmap (which may or may not be optimised away by the JIT). Elaborate allocation-free async is not an apple-to-apples comparison. JS does su
253.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
> Then I spent 2 weeks trying to do the same thing in rust… Eventually I gave up. In my experience, that kind of difference boils down to a combination of three things. - Comparing apples and oranges. For example, Box makes pinning trivi
254.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
> But keeping the current half-baked async implementation doesn't make the language smaller or simpler. It just makes the language worse. I can't disagree more. In fact, I think that the current state of async Rust is the best
255.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
It doesn't, at least not under GDPR and not in that scenario. Contoso is a "[personal] data controller" and SAP is a "data processor". Contoso has a legal responsibility for all personal data and for all its vendors
256.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
Going against the consensus, I'd recommend a Prusa MK4S instead. It'll likely serve you much longer and will achieve better dimensional precision and slightly better quality at the same speed. Be warned though, the printing part i
257.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
I don't think there's much inherent value in the CoreXY geometry. MK4S seems to outperform everything Bambu has both on speed and on quality (especially on overhangs and dimensional precision) despite being a bed slinger. On the o
258.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
In short: - print quality and speed is similar (new MK4S seems to be a bit better) - Bambu's design life is much shorter (Prusas are fully repairable with parts stocked in the online shop, and every new version release includes upgrade
259.
▲
How to Build a Supersonic Trebuchet [video]
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
dgroshev
2y ago
|
0 comments
260.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
Sure, but I believe the majority of OpenSCAD users are fine with non-commercial use.
261.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
It is, check out the sibling reply. Dassault's web 3DEXPERIENCE stuff is weird and unnecessary, but can be abstracted away behind a desktop shortcut.
262.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
SOLIDWORKS for Makers includes a full copy of SOLIDWORKS and costs $48/year https://www.solidworks.com/solution/3dexperience-solidworks-...
263.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
First of all, I'm sorry I upset you! That was definitely not intended. I'm not comparing the two, I want to show what's possible. I often see people finding OpenSCAD, getting comfortable with it because it's all code, an
264.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
If you find yourself doing a lot of OpenSCAD, you might want to check out what you're missing from more traditional CAD systems: A few examples of simple fillets in SOLIDWORKS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f78gblpqxH
265.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
I'm quite sure that's autosuggestion. I was kayaking on the Thames too (up in Richmond/Teddington), but on marathon/sprint kayaks which are very narrow and unstable, so most people in the kayaking club (hundreds of peopl
266.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
SOLIDWORKS for Makers is $48/year [1]. That subscription includes a proper SOLIDWORKS installation, Dassault is pushing their web stuff, but you don't need to use it. Also, it uses local files by default, unlike Fusion [2]. The su
267.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
Same. It's the best kind of science fiction, "society fiction" in SciFi clothes that tries to stay in the realm of plausibility and logic. They are terribly underrated.
268.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
I'm really sceptical that anything will happen in the CAD space bar massive state investment into open source infrastructure. Open CASCADE doesn't look to be catching up [1], while Solidworks continues to release foundational feat
269.
▲
by
dgroshev
2y ago
Proper footnotes have now landed! https://github.com/getzola/zola/commit/6a2b890545398bb21cab5...
270.
▲
Outdraw.ai: A Human vs. AI Drawing Game
(outdraw.ai)
2 points
by
dgroshev
2y ago
|
0 comments
More ›