dgellow

12 ms·

361.
by dgellow 2mo ago
A more recent one is https://world.hey.com/dhh/wolves-sheep-and-gypsies-ba44af6a
362.
by dgellow 2mo ago
Yes
363.
by dgellow 2mo ago
We are on a forum discussing our opinions on things FFS
364.
by dgellow 2mo ago
Reading the sources makes it way worse…
365.
by dgellow 2mo ago
How do you store passkeys?
366.
by dgellow 2mo ago
Im a happy Proton customer since a decade for their email and recently file storage service, but I’m concerned about having my passwords and my files and my emails in the same system. It’s risky to have so much in one company, if I lose my
367.
by dgellow 2mo ago
Oh fuck, 1Password is also part of the DHH crowd?!
368.
by dgellow 2mo ago
The fact that we constantly switch between the colloquial definitions of those terms and more specific, technical ones doesn’t help
369.
by dgellow 2mo ago
Which itself is fed to LLMs, what a beautiful system we built here
370.
by dgellow 2mo ago
They also very often do not actually read the fucking files! Even after specifying to „read in full the fucking files“. LLMs are so lazy, they take any shortcut they can. Sorry, just thinking about it is reviving my frustration…
371.
by dgellow 2mo ago
Wow, that’s awesome, you should submit it as a show HN!
372.
by dgellow 2mo ago
> AI agents don’t get lost Thats… not my experience. Like, not at all. They very regularly get lost
373.
by dgellow 2mo ago
I have no idea how you’re reading that from my comment
374.
by dgellow 2mo ago
I do not no, I don’t have an opinion on the Google situation. I was responding to the following: > Make enough money and pay off enough politicians, and you can pretty much shoot people on the street in broad daylight.
375.
by dgellow 2mo ago
What are you gesturing at? That type of vague posting is, well… too vague, I have no idea what position you’re hinting at
376.
by dgellow 2mo ago
There were discussions in Germany to do the same, but I don’t think they followed up on it
377.
by dgellow 2mo ago
What are the valid arguments against? Is it about the fact that the output isn’t “optimal”?
378.
by dgellow 2mo ago
> Knowing where content came from, and whether AI was involved, makes it easier to trust what you see online. That’s a cute way to imply their service is used to generate misinformation. They are basically saying to not trust the AI cont
379.
by dgellow 2mo ago
A bit different, but one thing I’ve seen is models repackaging Reddit slop. Like, it will do a search, find a Reddit thread somewhat related where someone in a comment casually mentioned incorrect information that any human would have dismi
380.
by dgellow 2mo ago
See OpenAI putting the blame on a “rogue agent” for their own systems hacking other companies (which is a felony!!!!). When in reality they obviously control the while loop and tool call dispatching of the agents. But they decided to train
381.
by dgellow 2mo ago
How is that relevant? I’m sure we all hate flock here, but what does that have to do with the article?
382.
by dgellow 2mo ago
Given how the AI industry lies about capabilities and is pushing the rollout with all their weight, the blame doesn’t go fully on their customers
383.
by dgellow 2mo ago
The claims: - Mr. Liu not only downloaded a confidential Apple circuit schematic but also used it in his work at OpenAI; - Far from his unauthorized access to Apple’s third-party cloud storage being unknown to him, Mr. Liu and others at Ope
384.
by dgellow 2mo ago
It’s fine if you do not want to engage with the person‘s work, but source of revenue is just one component to evaluate if someone is grifting
385.
by dgellow 2mo ago
> I don't recall him saying AI is bad or useless ever either. He does say that pretty often in interviews. That doesn’t change his thesis but that‘s one reasonable reason people dismiss him, he has often said that AI is useless when
386.
by dgellow 2mo ago
Yes, you can include me too. I’m aware enough of the details to know we don’t have any proof of anything fraudulent, but that whole situation is just so disgusting
387.
by dgellow 2mo ago
They actually do not, they do not share details on their AI revenue and investments
388.
by dgellow 2mo ago
That’s level 0 analysis, you’re supposed to go to the next steps and not stop here…
389.
by dgellow 2mo ago
Fair, if you’re looking for reliable financial commentary Matt Levine is indeed the goat. Zitron is more like an old school blogger, with a very aggressive and corrosive style. My approach for internal documents leaked by Zitron is just to
390.
by dgellow 2mo ago
Do you mean this section? > If you are going to look at this and say “actually it didn’t” because of its Enrontastic accounting treatment, I also need to warn you — that identical guy in the bathroom is actually a thing called a “mirror,

More ›