2 ms·
> Knowing where content came from, and whether AI was involved, makes it easier to trust what you see online. That’s a cute way to imply their service is used
by dgellow 2mo ago
> Knowing where content came from, and whether AI was involved, makes it easier to trust what you see online.
That’s a cute way to imply their service is used to generate misinformation. They are basically saying to not trust the AI content made from their own product :)
- pixl97 2mo agoI mean, if we're developing an AGI do you expect it not to be able to generate misinformation?
- dgellow 2mo agoI have no idea how you’re reading that from my comment
- pixl97 2mo agoAssociations are generally two ways. You could possibly build something that just generated misinformation in a non-generalized way, but you cannot build a generalized writing machine that can't write misinformation. I mean, I got what you were trying to say, I just turned it around on you using the same framework.
- borschtplease 2mo agoLike they should ban astronaut on a horse images or what? Misinformation becomes misinformation upon the fact of presenting it as so, not the fact of creation