dgarciaf18

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by dgarciaf18 17d ago

   this is peak rabbithole material
2. 2.▲
   by dgarciaf18 17d ago

   I don't think the idea of circular economy, where goods are produced with high manufacturing quality standards, applies to software. In the sense that producing high quality physical goods may not be beneficial for the producer. But pr
3. 3.▲
   by dgarciaf18 18d ago

   Production code should never depend on the attention of "the oldest guy in the office". We used to have methods not to break stuff: extensive automated testing, monitoring, QA, canary deployments, A/B testing. And, ultimately
4. 4.▲
   by dgarciaf18 18d ago

   The naming is... interesting. If the CI/CD pipeline fails, you get a pushie. Jokes aside, the tool looks very convenient. I have the CI/CD use case in mind. Having a GH actions template would be nice. Have you considered publishin
5. 5.▲
   by dgarciaf18 18d ago

   Do they even have automated testing? This should have been detected not only in one layer of the release process, but in serveral ones.