Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dfrage
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
> Intel and others are years behind Not clear anyone other than Intel is trying, but Intel's situation is much more complicated. They tried for a purely optical for its life "10nm" node more aggressive than TSMC's in
32.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
And there wouldn't be enough smart people. These lithography machines are completely wild: the part that fails the most spits out a tiny droplet of molten tin. That's hit with a laser, and the excited electrons emit what's c
33.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
Per Wikipedia, "the name was a condensation of "Can" from Canada and "ola" from other vegetable oils like Mazola".
34.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
> My original point is that we should not be crippling something very useful (javascript in the browser) because of flawed architectures that mostly affect one company in a way that decimates performance. Lots of us have a different opin
35.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
Hits forehead for forgetting to check SemiWiki. But note that since then Global Foundries has abandoned for now offering this general node, 7nm as they name it, 10nm as Intel does. But isn't the whole die exposed and otherwise process
36.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
> The "don't apply the updates" argument in security is basically philosophically comparable to the antivax movement As long as you also apply the quarantine principle when relevant. And herd immunity, both applied backwa
37.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
It's a good analogy as long as Intel was the first to experience the end of Dennard scaling ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennard_scaling ) because their fab lines were ahead of the rest of the industry's. A
38.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
KBR = Kaby Lake Refresh. Interesting, in that Intel's "10nm" node is said to be more power efficient than their "14nm" node, in this case, per AnandTech ( https://www.anandtech.com/show/11738&#x
39.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
That's interesting, and relevant in that the NexGen team was joined by DEC Alpha people to do the K7, but the K6 is not AMD's first out-of-order speculative execution x86 design, per Wikipedia the K5 was an internal project that &
40.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
Way inside Tueller Drill range ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tueller_Drill ), if the grizzly disabled her in the first blow her situation was indeed impossible. If not, and that's reported by some survivors, depe
41.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
The current set of vulnerabilities target Intel specific microarchitectural features, like the first version of Foreshadow/L1TF targeted the SGX enclave, which by definition isn't in other company's CPUs. Given that AMD is fu
42.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
I've heard entirely the opposite, that having a close relationship between chip designers and fabricators allows for higher performance designs. I don't know of anyone who interpreted AMD selling off its foundries as anything oth
43.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
These vulnerabilities can jump process address space boundaries. It's a lot harder but can be done, look at the original Spectre paper: https://spectreattack.com/spectre.pdf
44.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
Not tntn, but I've been following this and it seems to be both Intel's now decades long history of very bad high level engineering and personal management catching up with their crown jewel, and being more aggressive than TSMC
45.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
Amplifying the other current replies, what you're bemoaning and what slagged the Netburst "marchitecture" is the end of MOSFET Dennard Scaling: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennard_scaling Moore's
46.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
Sounds like it. None of the brand names you mention were known in my part of the US at the time, and I don't even recognize any of them today except for Gundig. For TVs, Japan very conveniently for the US shares the same NSTC standard
47.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
> Also, to keep this all in perspective, we are talking about seven companies that made egregious engineering decisions to maintain their market leadership which has put their customers at risk. Fixed it for you, the current list I hav
48.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
If it had been practical to keep with the PPC line Mac users today would have the same problems, seeing as how POWER CPUs suffer from both Meltdown and Spectre: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meltdown_(security_vulnerabi
49.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
I've read that the RS-25 level of "reuse" was highly qualified, they required a significant rebuild between flights because they pushed the margins so hard. Wikipedia says "refurbished" https://en.wikipe
50.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
I absolutely don't know anyone who was saying that about Japanese electronics in the 1970s in my part of US flyover country. Sony was considered to be one of the very best in the world, and my family was greatly disappointed in the
51.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
Your theory proved correct in the 1970s, things got so messed up "everything" rose, both unemployment and inflation driving a stake into the heart of the Phillips Curve, and what people demanded to buy private or Federal debt. Th
52.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
Killing the bear isn't the objective, stopping it from killing you is,the same goes for legitimate self-defense against humans. And it turns out that's frequently possible, even with human self-defense handgun calibers. You mi
53.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
In the most recent discussion of this it was reported that is no longer an easy option with Firefox: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20012750 There's also a general impression that would be too slow for many web
54.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
The other area they can't complete is on variable or disaster recovery scenarios, the sort where you'll reserve CPU instances, but only spin them up for your heavy load parts of the day or when you have an unexpected migration. A
55.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
Red Hat released info about z/OS mainframes, they're also vulnerable to Meltdown as well as Spectre. ARM also has one new design that's vulnerable to Meltdown, and everyone has Spectre vulnerable designs.
56.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
Oops, didn't read your comment closely enough, strike my above comment. Followed the Wikipedia link to the 1995 Fujitsu/HAL out-of-order design ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAL_SPARC64 ) and it says it'
57.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
I'm saying Intel's design decisions are found in so many other vendors, Spectre in all of them I've looked for, that it represents an industry blind spot. Which calls for different kinds of "accountability", unle
58.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
What's expensive, and some time ago became a significant limiting factor in densely packing machine rooms, is removing heat from the room. As long as you can supply cool air to the racks they can take care of removing heat from mother
59.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
I was just discussing this with a friend. Obviously there's a certain degree of multi-tenancy sharing that's most cost effective. For electrical power use and removing heat there's a floor where, if not being used, the best
60.
▲
by
dfrage
7y ago
Or did no one bother to check the older designs??
More ›