dfischer

12 ms·

91.
by dfischer 6y ago
It’s not mutually exclusive. Facebook is complicit. TikTok however is specifically a unique entity on its own. The demographics that use it are of critical interest to persuade additionally the data is directly at risk of being used as info
92.
by dfischer 6y ago
Yeah, sorry I was rushing and wasn’t thinking on how much time I had to investigate. Well it’s out there... Sucks but all I know is I’ve seen it. It could be buried heavily by now. There has been infosec evidence provided. Edit: this too? M
93.
by dfischer 6y ago
There’s evidence online, I don’t have it handy but a quick search found this: https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/fxgi06/not_new_news...
94.
by dfischer 6y ago
TikTok is the generation that is most malleable to propaganda in a way that can undermine an entire generation. TikTok also has history of recording telemetry that’s extremely alarming. Look into what is mined. Look into how algorithms get
95.
by dfischer 6y ago
Have you seen Factor? https://factorcode.org/
96.
by dfischer 6y ago
This is interesting. Thanks.
97.
by dfischer 6y ago
Precisely.
98.
by dfischer 6y ago
I think ratios are closer to existing as something real as the modification of a ratio has physical implications. Ratios are discovered, math is invented.
99.
by dfischer 6y ago
Yeah I appreciate your thoughts in this realm. It’s balanced. Good to think about. I am of the perspective that it’s all a whole and interactions within a whole create observational effects. I don’t think there’s an absolute answer as much
100.
Sectorforth is a 16-bit x86 Forth that fits in a 512-byte boot sector(github.com)
2 points by dfischer 6y ago|0 comments
101.
by dfischer 6y ago
Thank you kindly for the reply and I share your moments of trials. I think it’s important to expand further in this direction. Confirmation bias or not, I’m compelled to dig further under these ideas. Thanks. I notice you’re on a throwaway.
102.
by dfischer 6y ago
“ physicists are well aware that their trade is about mathematical models of magnitudes they can measure (and extra stuff they can't yet comes in handy to do that), not reality or the physical world in itself” This is entirely oxymoron
103.
by dfischer 6y ago
It’s a great question. That depends on if an emotion and image would be language. Given we had no language and communicated telepathically I’ve imagined that: 1. Using a feeling 2. Using a mental image May be enough to form abstractions but
104.
by dfischer 6y ago
All concepts are language.
105.
by dfischer 6y ago
A concept never just is. For something to “is” it must exist and show me a prime number that exists.
106.
by dfischer 6y ago
Precisely. Language under the context that it is a restricted set of abstractions used to communicate a set of consistencies. Language itself is an exclusive operation on the possible coordinates of anything within a universe.
107.
by dfischer 6y ago
In a way you’re just doing language associated to analogies and agreed conditions. So closer to games than math.
108.
by dfischer 6y ago
Symmetry is a property that our senses allow us to reason about but it proves nothing of the “inherent natural world”
109.
by dfischer 6y ago
The education system has utterly failed in its duty in teaching how to use the mind. Instead we see masses are indoctrinated and told what is, and what to remember rather than first principles and tooling to reason. We must do better! Good
110.
by dfischer 6y ago
Signal theory is deeply interesting based on your line of thinking here. I’ve been postulating similar things. The universe gives a lot of potential for things to communicate. In the end what is recognized as signal and or information is a
111.
by dfischer 6y ago
Number of people who use lightning network and don’t know how to use a terminal is probably less than 10.
112.
by dfischer 6y ago
Maybe yes maybe no. It depends on what the updates are.
113.
by dfischer 6y ago
Better to put anything as nonfiction as fiction at this rate!
114.
by dfischer 6y ago
Easily googled.
115.
by dfischer 6y ago
Zero? Definitely more than zero. In fact you’ll find papers if you try that put the probability higher than anyone other than Nick S. But it doesn’t really matter in the end in my opinion. The whole point was to not have a godhead.
116.
by dfischer 6y ago
Also the timing of his death and satoshi presence...
117.
Continuum Mechanics(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points by dfischer 6y ago|0 comments
118.
by dfischer 6y ago
I won’t remind them of my feedback but I’d never give up on telling them where they should improve.
119.
by dfischer 6y ago
Fair enough - however I haven’t heard the scientific community talk much of this problem. The unfortunate side of gated communities and information. I will be more mindful of my ranting. Thanks for sharing.
120.
by dfischer 6y ago
Maybe your intuition provides an analogous but different conclusion that may be more suitable to novel conceptual models of reality. Pursue your intuition I’d say. I’m in a similar path. Oddly I find music to be a good hint of reality latel

More ›