dfh99

2 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by dfh99 14y ago

   Mark's wife (yes, i think this expression is much better) is still not "his woman". no woman belong to no man, and vice versa. Priscilla is her own person, just as Mark is.
2. 2.▲
   by dfh99 14y ago

   i agree. it's difficult to say exactly where the problem lies. to me, the original comment just had a bad ring to it. i'm sure it was not intentional.
3. 3.▲
   by dfh99 14y ago

   please don't think of her as "HIS WOMAN" (or him as her man). this implies ownership, and marriage is not about ownership. he might have worn it out of respect/love for her, yes.