Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dfawcus
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
211.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
The above GH link don't work for me - too much JS coupling. This however yields content: https://archive.is/IoShg
212.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
How do these fingerprinting schemes work when the handshake protocol is not merely obfuscated, but actually encrypted? i.e. if one uses the tls-crypt option? As I understand it, that encrypts the handshake protocol such that simple data val
213.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
Yeah - and I used one of them, and the Windows version on it. About all it got used for under windows were Reversi, and Write. It also came with WordStar 2000, which was a bit weird... The one I had access to had the small green screen moni
214.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
A minor quibble. The UK is a 'state', not a 'country'. It comprises of countries: Scotland, England, Wales, and a small chunk of Ireland.
215.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
Well it does, in written bits in various places, and some as precedent. However it is a bit more complex. England has a constitution (that collection above), Scotland has a different (and somewhat incompatible) constitution. The incompatib
216.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
I was in a large supermarket (Tesco) today where they were experiencing "technical difficulties". A repeated announcement over the tannoy stated they could not accept contact-less payments, not by card, not by phone. They were sti
217.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
"And it's example of how painful it can be to set that up as NAT broke the original FTP for a while." NAT broke FTP for about the 5 seconds it took for one to realise they needed to type in the PASV command - which existed ri
218.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
I was disagreeing with your first paragraph. If the splitting is optional, as it would have to be now, and as I proposed it would not add complexity since it would be opt in. Theoretically if it had split from the start, it may have added a
219.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
Compare with what existed when NCP (RFC 33) was in use. An early FTP protocol (452, 454, 542) originally used a server listen port of 3 (and hence a server "return port" of 2*), but 542 allowed temporary use of port 21 as the prot
220.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
No, he wants a way for the close of the FD from generate-data to process-data to trigger a TCP FIN over the connection, such that process-data sees an input EOF. However for that to work, the two FDs (generate-date to process-data, and proc
221.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
Sort of - NCP (RFC 33) had two simplex sockets. Even being receive, odd transmit. That then led to various higher level protocols using pairs of ports. Once TCP took over, that was relaxed.
222.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
Nah - one would just add a new syscall, to split the fd. int sock_fd, split_pair[2]; char c; int n = socket_split(sock_fd, split_pair); close(sock_fd); n = write(split_pair[1], "a", 1); close(split_pair[1
223.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
Nope, and (IMHO) you're missing the point. duping the fd's as you describe would achieve nothing, as both fds will share the same file, and hence while either fd is open, the kernel can not detect a close. The process-data task is
224.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
Contact details for myself, if that is what you meant, should be irrelevant. Most (if not all) the needed information will be available in the documents under this directory: https://bitsavers.org/pdf/digitalResear
225.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
It is (or was) a real time protected mode OS for 286 processors. I actually used that compiler over 25 years ago, it generates Intel OMF files with 8086/80186/80286 - As I recall one can select the target. So post compiling, one s
226.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
Then taking it with the Apricot PCs (which he did mention), the Apricot Xen was a 286 version of the Apricot Xi. https://apricot-archive.co.uk/xen I distinctly remember that massive (and heavy) power supply!
227.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
> You don't need to be a member of the EU to be a member of the EU customs union. Yes you do. Read the ToR. > Monaco is not an EU member state, yet it is a member of the EU customs union. That is _a_ customs union with the EU, n
228.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
The UK can not have a written constitution; simply because that of England is incompatible with that of Scotland. In Scotland, the people are sovereign, can (and have) sacked their monarch. In England, the monarch was sovereign, now it is &
229.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
Great Britain is an Island. England is one country and geographical region within that island. Wales and Scotland are the other countries within that island. Some of the surrounding islands are respectively part of the countries of England
230.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
Except I was not asking for it, simply making an observation. If the MPs actually wanted to be successful in thwarting it, they should have blocked the sending of the Article 50 notification. i.e. either placed conditions on the notificati
231.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
Leaving the CU was inevitable in leaving the EU, since the core of the ToR is a CU. We could have left the EU and (in theory) re-joined EFTA, then kept the EEA agreement operational. That would have left us with SM membership, and aligning
232.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
Actually, they're Codex Alimentarius and/or UNECE marketing standards which we're signed up for in our own right. Nowt to do with the EU. They still apply to us. The only thing the EU rules added were exceptions for undersi
233.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
There are no international water in the short straits between England and France. To send a ship back we'd have to escort it, then the French would forcefully object to our actions. Basically for us to send ships back, or send people b
234.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
Sort of, but we were never in Schengen. However that didn't constrain EU workers, as the 4 freedoms are distinct from, and predate Schengen.
235.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
That didn't really matter. The result of the Miller case placed the decision back in the hands of parliament. They then overwhelming chose to grant the Government a carte blanc to trigger Article 50. They could have chosen to impose c
236.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
It is not possible in the UK to have a "binding referendum", merely a "self executing one". i.e. one where prior legislation is activated based upon the result of the poll.
237.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
Legally they could have ignored it. Then taken their knocks in the next GE.
238.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
> Did the UK have a legal obligation to allow EU citizens to live and work freely in the UK while in the EU? Yes. As long as they're not a burden on the state*. The "4 freedoms". > Did the UK have the legal right to a
239.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
We did not negotiate perks, we simply refused to move from our existing conditions when new treaties were negotiated. i.e. we stayed with something close to our entry conditions, accepted some changes from new treaties. So the "opt o
240.
▲
by
dfawcus
3y ago
The government are no longer able to use EU rules as an excuse for their failures. It is now all on them. So there is a definite path of responsibility. People have to wake up to that, and let the politicians know. It is likely we'll
More ›