detcader

71 ms·

841.
by detcader 13y ago
All this advice seems to ignore what sociologist Emily Kane calls "The Gender Trap" (in her book by the same name), where females are _taught_ by their parent(s) from their birth to prioritize things like appearance and social sta
842.
Poli-Ticks by Asylum 7 (2005)(unitedstatesofmind.bandcamp.com)
1 points by detcader 13y ago|0 comments
843.
The persecution of Barrett Brown - and how to fight it (March 2013)(guardian.co.uk)
2 points by detcader 13y ago|0 comments
844.
by detcader 13y ago
We're going to have to go to the streets to do this. This is something where a government needs to see physical people to be swayed.
845.
by detcader 13y ago
The CEO answers to shareholders, not users. A CEO of a company with shareholders is not a living organism with the possibility of having a moral compass but instead a (don't snicker) machine, one that makes deterministic (ultimately pr
846.
by detcader 13y ago
"Allegedly" is a word needed only by people unfamiliar with his body of work. He seemingly spends literally all day every day doing one thing: criticizing the US government's expansion of authoritarian power. Judging from the
847.
by detcader 13y ago
>because I don't think Greenwald cares about protecting US interests Why is this again? Have you read any of, or even heard of, his books or his articles? Before you answer, be sure not to fall into the trap so common as to be a cli
848.
by detcader 13y ago
The current incarnation of the U.S government has _tortured people_, I doubt they'd have any problem with disobeying their own laws and just going after Greenwald and figuring out the justification later. If you disagree, then we diffe
849.
by detcader 13y ago
Care to enlighten us as to how? And by "us" I mean President Obama (who was pretty much forced to comment on it and certainly didn't say anything like you did), those in the administration going after the leaker(s) (for if th
850.
Does he fear getting droned too?(charliedavis.blogspot.com)
1 points by detcader 13y ago|0 comments
851.
by detcader 13y ago
From Matt Bors: "There’s a line I’ve seen trotted a few times now that goes, “Ah, we knew all this was happening, you idiots!” We didn’t know. If you knew about PRISM you should have scooped The Guardian and made a name for yourself. T
852.
by detcader 13y ago
Haha sorry... been a busy week. I misinterpreted your intent with your original post. Should have indicated that I was being rhetorical/willfully asking the begged question I thought I saw
853.
by detcader 13y ago
Some guy on Tumblr picked apart Yahoo's carefully worded denial, actually [1] turns out it's totally bunk [1] http://peterhassett.tumblr.com/post/52499296411/exclamation-...
854.
by detcader 13y ago
Can you explain the labeling of WikiLeaks as an enemy organization and fears that Assange has? Why don't you tell these things to Greenwald himself on Twitter or in an email? The release of any secret through a media outlet could be co
855.
by detcader 13y ago
Check again: The Guardian US is an American LLC. [1] It would be in their best interest to disappear him ASAP? Maybe that's why The Atlantic's Washington Editor-at-Large just tweeted that he overheard four government officials on
856.
by detcader 13y ago
I was being facetious, trying to get the parent poster to elaborate. I'm quite familiar with the discourse on rape and rape culture.
857.
by detcader 13y ago
The Guardian as a news outlet could be prosecuted/gone after for releasing certain things. It isn't just him making the decisions. On Twitter he seems to express the desire to release as much as he can without earning himself a Di
858.
by detcader 13y ago
If you read Greenwald's writing regularly, you know that this is exactly the kind of information about the kind of programs that Glenn has been imagining to exist, for many many years, during both administrations. The timing comes from
859.
by detcader 13y ago
"hacked"? It could easily be someone(s) with legitimate access to these documents, couldn't it? International espionage in what way? The leaker(s) could have just sold this information to foreign governments, but they went to
860.
by detcader 13y ago
Greenwald replies to a Twitter user asking "when do we see the full redacted deck?" "@markskogan @nycsouthpaw You won't - it contains very specific technical NSA means for collection - we'd probably be prosecuted if
861.
by detcader 13y ago
That this doublespeak surprises anyone shows the tragedy of the small size of Glenn Greenwald's readership. He has been writing on Obama's abuses and misdirection since Obama admin has been in power; and before that, he's wri
862.
by detcader 13y ago
I thought the poster was referring to something other than "Men's Rights Advocates"; maybe implicitly trotting out the hackneyed "Tumblr SJ crazies" strawmen
863.
by detcader 13y ago
What debate is "surrounding rape" exactly? Are you referring to a debate as to whether rape is ethically permissible or not? If so, where do you hang out?
864.
by detcader 13y ago
Kill Aaron, put kids in prison for dDOSing... but for god sakes, don't ever try to send a message to potential rapists! That would be oppressing men everywhere!
865.
by detcader 13y ago
I agree; a bets minimal option set would be the ones most used on G Reader as far as I can tell: * Option to hide any unread feeds on sidebar (totally essential for me) * Unread count on feeds with new items * Ability to edit and rename fol
866.
by detcader 13y ago
The document that Greenwald presented, which is the only document of its kind so far, makes it clear that when it says "Verizon" it means "Verizon Business Network Services". Sure: by whatever insane reasoning the government came up with to
867.
by detcader 13y ago
Cross-posting from the other comment forum: Everyone should realize one thing that makes this news slightly less scary, but still scary nonetheless: the order only applies to "Verizon Business Network Services", which is not the entirety of
868.
by detcader 13y ago
I mean, the only phone calls ever made are between individuals; but yes, this order only applies to calls involving VBNS phones, not all Verizon phones in general as this article implies and many MSM outlets are saying. That makes it no les
869.
by detcader 13y ago
Everyone should realize one thing that makes this news slightly less scary, but still scary nonetheless: the order only applies to "Verizon Business Network Services", which is not the entirety of Verizon Communications. While this still me
870.
OTR Encrypted File Transfer Specification for Cryptocat(github.com)
2 points by detcader 13y ago|0 comments

More ›