desterothx

4 ms·

1.
by desterothx 9d ago
Yeah, just take the EBITDA and suddenly the valuations make sense. Paying money for a vending machine that currently loses money hand over fist is generally not a sound investment strategy
2.
by desterothx 10d ago
Yes I have no problems with them looks-wise. They don't build them on parking lots/factory roofs because of efficiency. Good solar panels follow the sun, which isnt really a mechanism practical to setup in a parking lot. maintenan
3.
by desterothx 10d ago
You don't have to look into the animal kingdom, history works too. No ruling empire has fallen silently and without conflict. Changing the world order always included an aggressive transfer of power
4.
by desterothx 11d ago
If there is no funding for helping the people coming from the non evangelical sources, i'm sure the people would rather have medicine than keep dying, no matter the indoctrination they receive
5.
by desterothx 15d ago
Speaking as a person that had to buy 2 additional psp chargers (my ebook reader uses one too), please throw those onto ebay or your local marketplace instead :)
6.
by desterothx 15d ago
Well he probably didn't admit the user error part
7.
by desterothx 15d ago
I mean that is addressed as well later, even when they do declare the quantization, doesn't mean you'll get better performance than the lower quantized one. I'm guessing they're doing something similar to what stadia was
8.
by desterothx 15d ago
IMO it doesn't make sense for LLMs to write machine code, because abstraction allows them to have more information density. As context size is a big limitation right now, cluttering it with less dense information seems like a bad idea.
9.
by desterothx 16d ago
The speeds are theoretical (unachievable), time dilation itself is robust and proved (gps wouldn't work as precisely without accounting for it)
10.
by desterothx 17d ago
They have no zero data retention commitments anymore though? In fact they have quite the opposite, a direct message of storing prompts since the release of sol (but we wont train on it trust us wink wink)
11.
by desterothx 17d ago
Billions lost, while waiting for their trillion ipo. Im sure they would manage...
12.
by desterothx 17d ago
They will, as soon as they get the same proof without it being obvious in the prompts they stole the research
13.
by desterothx 17d ago
Because your competitor is likely doing the same thing, so they wont even try to call you out. Oh oh or because you're planning the largest IPO in history. The opinions of average people on the paper aren't going to be the ones re
14.
by desterothx 17d ago
Where were you seeing those roumors? Care to point to an HN post?
15.
by desterothx 18d ago
Sure we do, you can follow the weights so to say, to see which data turns out to be more important vs less important for predictions of a higher quality
16.
by desterothx 18d ago
The alps are shared between Switzerland, Italy and France. You can live in the French alps a lot cheaper than in Switzerland
17.
by desterothx 18d ago
We are talking about models of the flash size, 100s of billions of parameters, don't listen to the media, size does matter
18.
by desterothx 19d ago
As the agi nurse fails to wipe his ass the intelligent HN commenter shouted: "You're moving the goalposts. You never said it needs to wipe my ass SUCCESFULLY"
19.
by desterothx 19d ago
Where are you getting your information from? From all I've seen the RL gives an incremental improvement, most of the capability increase comes from new model architectures (eg the jump from opus to fable is greater than the jump from o
20.
by desterothx 19d ago
Well it could assure MAD better than a human i guess
21.
by desterothx 22d ago
astrum is one star, astra is a plural of stars
22.
by desterothx 22d ago
iirc, some of the original fable bemchmarks showed this. Definitely saw it in other frontier releases though
23.
by desterothx 22d ago
Could you point me to the goals so I know when I'm moving the goalposts?
24.
by desterothx 22d ago
How would you define intelligence in terms of optimization theory? Also intelligence implies more than just problem solving, in fact it's another one of those pesky hard to define things
25.
by desterothx 22d ago
Made 4800 dollars in 2 weeks, EBITDA of course, with the demand of the novelty of an ai driven cafe, and with a single customer providing 20% of its revenue. In other words, it lost money. For further reading see [1] [1] https://y
26.
by desterothx 22d ago
Climate change is a well defined term. AGI isn't. You're comparing apples and toasters
27.
by desterothx 22d ago
I'm so sick of every criticism being explained away as goal post moving. Can anyone give me the discussion where we came to some concensus of what the goals were? How can I know when I'm moving a goalpost when no one told me the g
28.
by desterothx 24d ago
The compatibility with the lab hardware part is going to take a little while, for now running experiments is problematic for LLMs
29.
by desterothx 25d ago
I would argue this has been googles approach as well
30.
by desterothx 26d ago
The questions the LLMs can't solve puts you in a cat and mouse game. They sure can solve most of those with the correct tooling, and i would argue its easier to create this tooling than it is to keep innovating with new questions LLMs

More ›