derangedHorse

4 ms·

1.
by derangedHorse 7d ago
Intuition happens naturally and people are prone to inducting the wrong conclusions. Proofs provide a framework for rigorously analyzing drawn conclusions such that it can be used to build intuition in others. If math is about sharing the i
2.
by derangedHorse 9d ago
Tail emissions and infinite divisibility are proposals to address this.
3.
by derangedHorse 15d ago
This would be a new publication with OpenAI's novel solution. Buckmaster and Alpöge did not arrive at the NS solution, they used an approach that also happened to be used in OpenAI's proof. > there’s absolutely no reason to d
4.
by derangedHorse 15d ago
> AI maths makes no sense, like AI art makes no sense, because those are things that people enjoy and can do pretty damn well ourselves so there's no point to automate them away. There are people who appreciate and have use for math
5.
by derangedHorse 16d ago
> Only after learning the secret to cracking the problem did they send the first prompt. Which quote in the announcement post provides evidence for the above quote?
6.
by derangedHorse 16d ago
Going back to the specific topic at hand, who claimed data as their own when it wasn't? I don't see the interpretation of OpenAI solving the unsolved problem as claiming data that isn't theirs. I also don't recall them m
7.
by derangedHorse 16d ago
I think that flow is an easy way to disable everything, so there isn’t a risk of forgetting to flip one thing back off after accidentally setting it on. I set my ChatGPT environment to allow model improvement for example but had to check my
8.
by derangedHorse 16d ago
> capturing large amounts of data and connecting the dots. This is what research is; collecting data and connecting the dots.
9.
by derangedHorse 17d ago
The only way it would be able to tell you the ending is if it was somehow given more importance in pretraining, loaded into context, or represented in multiple sets of training samples. I have a blog that I make very LLM friendly and usuall
10.
by derangedHorse 17d ago
> And various dedicated AI models all made poor predictions of the results of that experiment, which casts doubts about the value of the AlphaGenome predictive map I would not group AlphaGenome into the pile of failed predictions of othe
11.
by derangedHorse 17d ago
I don’t think your question is unfair*. They can check and so can Buckmaster. If he didn’t opt out, there’s a good chance his data was used for training. I believe this to be the case myself. What I’m more skeptical about is the purported
12.
by derangedHorse 17d ago
> It seems like people who might want to use OpenAI's models as part of their research would want to be very clear about whether doing so can make them, even in principle, more likely to fall victim to this. Fall “victim” to what? H
13.
by derangedHorse 17d ago
> Per OpenAI's privacy policy, they use de-identified data to improve their products That’s not inconsistent with what you responded to. They use your data unless you opt out. If the user doesn’t opt out, their de-identified data is
14.
by derangedHorse 17d ago
Except that’s not what happened. OpenAI offered to collaborate and put conditions on their offer. They aren’t threatening the removal of a coauthor for an independent work.
15.
by derangedHorse 17d ago
While I can sympathize with this perspective, I don’t think it’s right to call it driven by “ego.” Sometimes one just wants to go at a problem without being second guessed on approaches or led astray with suggestions by others.
16.
by derangedHorse 18d ago
> OpenAI needs to definitively prove that their agents did not look at the existing work that was about to be published. I don’t think they’re too concerned about appeasing you, enraged_camel. For most reasonable people, achievement in s
17.
Ineffable Intelligence adds six cofounders(fortune.com)
1 points by derangedHorse 18d ago|0 comments
18.
by derangedHorse 18d ago
It sounds like OpenAI is trying to appease the author when they don’t have to by allowing him to rewrite their proof. They probably don’t believe he deserves to, so him asking for a coauthor from Anthropic might overextend their grace in th
19.
by derangedHorse 23d ago
Lol
20.
by derangedHorse 27d ago
> My physicist friend once asked me what the point of doing research was if someone like Terence Tao could have figured out everything in my dissertation in a tenth of the time. I answered by pointing out that Terence Tao didn’t. Terence
21.
by derangedHorse 28d ago
To let potential readers know there’s more to the story than the presented interpretation.
22.
by derangedHorse 1mo ago
Yeah the real xcancel link is https://xcancel.com/WassymBensaid/status/2090098856595951717
23.
by derangedHorse 1mo ago
As someone who's watched all Strang's lectures and read most of Axler's book, I found Linear Algebra and Its Applications to give the most interesting treatment on the topic. What made it so special was its clear explanations
24.
by derangedHorse 1mo ago
The existence and acknowledgement of moral relativism does not preclude moral chastisement.
25.
by derangedHorse 1mo ago
I'd like to caution against extending stories with too much of one's interpretation/imagination and insisting the extended version proves author intent of the original.
26.
by derangedHorse 1mo ago
If you haven't gotten a refusal from AI yet to answer a question, I guess you haven't annoyed it enough. Claude very much threatens to stop conversing on re-hashed topics with repeated arguments within a thread lol.
27.
by derangedHorse 1mo ago
Ironically, the same applies to AI. We seem to get demonstrably better results when speaking to models encouragingly [1]. It's a lot easier to re-establish goodwill when you can clear the memory and context of a program vs. a human tho
28.
by derangedHorse 2mo ago
Terra has not been able to do any of the technical tasks I've asked of it correctly. I'm surprised others get use out of it. Anything below Sol high tends to give me mostly unreliable results. I'm using codex as my main harne
29.
by derangedHorse 2mo ago
How did you draw an association between dannyw and Cactus? There are no 'Danny's on the list of GH contributors nor is there one named in the paper. Just curious.
30.
by derangedHorse 2mo ago
Yes, I think OP understands that. What he and many others in this thread are trying to understand is what makes this model useful.

More ›