Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
denzil_correa
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
91.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
> Being well-informed means going in with the best possible knowledge. The assumption here is that you have access to that knowledge. In many cases, you just don't. You can't address it by emails or talking to anyone. All these
92.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
All negotiations work in good faith until you encounter Information Asymmetry [0]. Then, it is really a "win-lose" situation. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_asymmetry
93.
▲
Intellectual ability gender stereotypes emerge early and influence children
(fermatslibrary.com)
1 points
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
|
0 comments
94.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
Not all 200 articles in stat.ML are SOTA research.
95.
▲
Information Overload Is a Fake Problem
(scotthyoung.com)
1 points
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
|
0 comments
96.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
> Jio for making the Data rate too cheap > (Less than 1$ for 2-3 GB.) Cheap is not the same as affordable. 1$ in India is equivalent to ~18 US$ [0]. [0] https://data.oecd.org/conversion/purchasing-power-parities-p
97.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
> Behold the FAKEery of The New Yorker. ... > First of all, Babri Masjid was an illegal structure (As per SC judgement). Can you point me to the part of the Supreme Court judgment which mentions "Babri Masjid was an illegal struc
98.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
The rule I quoted is a summary of the position and not to be taken as legal framework on decision making. The rules are mulled over in the white paper and it would take some time to digest it before making a comment on how the rule could po
99.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
That's where EU GDPR comes into the frame with informed consent for tracking.
100.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
I can't read the link as its down but here's an article that does a good job of explaining the leaked EU report [0]. > As for facial recognition, the Commission document highlights provisions from the EU’s General Data Protecti
101.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
> PLOS ONE’s fee is $1,595. A factor of 3 doesn’t seem inexplainable to me. You need to first explain why PLOS ONE is an appropriate baseline. A world class Open Access journal costs roughly $10 per submission [0]. Most arguments I have
102.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
> Someone has to find a suitable reviewer, which can be a bit time-consuming task [1], write to reviewers, just do all the coordination. This is done by the Program Chairs of the conference who are professors at universities. ACM doesn&#
103.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
Thanks Jeremy for highlighting this issue. A lot of scientific publishers have hijacked "Open Access" to charge high fees for the same publication as before and pocket more money. For example, "Springer Blood Cancer Journal&q
104.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
> This post makes no sense. ArXiv is a site to which papers are posted. ACM and IEEE are technical societies with a range of publications professionally managed, peer reviewed, and edited I have been a reviewer of many ACM, Elsevier etc.
105.
▲
Japan and Thailand Confirm New Cases of Chinese Coronavirus
(nytimes.com)
2 points
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
|
0 comments
106.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
23andMe hasn’t yet, created the drug. They’ve a potential candidate that they sold to a Spanish pharmaceutical company. The Spanish company would have to perform clinical trials before distribution.
107.
▲
Can an AI Be an Inventor? Not Yet
(technologyreview.com)
1 points
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
|
0 comments
108.
▲
Equality Conundrum – We agree inequality is bad but what kind equality is good?
(newyorker.com)
1 points
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
|
0 comments
109.
▲
PGP keys, software security, and much more threatened by new SHA1 exploit
(arstechnica.com)
1 points
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
|
0 comments
110.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
Let's not confuse accountability of decision making entity with consequences faced by the accountability. I was referring to the former, not the latter. The former is a case for law, the latter is a subject of law enforcement. In the c
111.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
Yes, that’s true. But human decisions have accountability - algorithms don’t have accountability. If entities who deploy algorithms would be legally required to take accountability for algorithmic decisions, there would be no issue with bla
112.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
One needs to form an experimental design with a ability to detect the challenge, understand the properties and come up with an appropriate computational solution to that challenge. This isn’t just for Machine Learning but for any kind of al
113.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
Remember, this move only came about after the FTC fine and is a result of a follow up to the $5Bn settlement. I wonder if this is enough though. Meanwhile, > Before the latest change, Facebook conducted a review to ensure “the system up
114.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
The inclusion of the Arcade tab on the App Store has pushed this change. I'm guessing that Apple feels like most people don't really update apps manually and just do an auto-update.
115.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
The 32 suicides were reported amongst the 32,000 people whose jobs were affected.
116.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
32 reported suicides in 32,000 people whose jobs were affected.
117.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
> First - the rate of suicides at Orange during this time were pretty much on par with suicide rates in France overall. Orange has 100K employees, and there are going to be suicides every year. There were 35 suicides in ~ 32,000 workers,
118.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
You may want to look into Base rate fallacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy
119.
▲
Data is the new snake oil
(stgallenbusinessreview.com)
2 points
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
|
0 comments
120.
▲
by
denzil_correa
7y ago
I have been a reviewer for (Computer Science) journals of publications like - Springer, Elsevier, IEEE, AAAI and ACM. The reviewer doesn't receive any money for reviews. The editing is entirely taken care by the authors of the paper.
More ›