4 ms·
> Behold the FAKEery of The New Yorker. ... > First of all, Babri Masjid was an illegal structure (As per SC judgement). Can you point me to the part of the
by denzil_correa 7y ago
> Behold the FAKEery of The New Yorker.
...
> First of all, Babri Masjid was an illegal structure (As per SC judgement).
Can you point me to the part of the Supreme Court judgment which mentions "Babri Masjid was an illegal structure"? Just to make it easy for you, here's the judgment [0]. It doesn't talk about Babri Masjid being illegal. The legality of Babri would not make any sense in independent India considering the structure was built 500 years ago. In fact, the SC clearly states that the demolition of Babri was illegal. It is ironic you call out New Yoker for FAKEery but indulge in the same.
[0] https://www.sci.gov.in/pdf/JUD_2.pdf https://www.sci.gov.in/pdf/JUD_2.pdf
- ComputerGuru 7y agoSave your breath. It’s zealotry, look at the comment history. To think a mosque built in the 1500s could be “illegal” under laws of a government that didn’t even exist.