demibabs

5 ms·

61.
by demibabs 2mo ago
but then no human generated comments allowed either, right?
62.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Author, that doesn’t mean you need to get Gemini to write your article.
63.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Not any rooted device, it must be rooted via an exploit. Still pretty bad, though
64.
by demibabs 2mo ago
I guess it’s more like asking the paid genie to give you a new cheaper genie.
65.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Mass adoption isn’t where the money is, though. It doesn’t matter if ChatGPT has 1 billion users if they won’t pay for it.
66.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Comparing GDP to net worths isn’t very meaningful
67.
by demibabs 2mo ago
What do you mean? The watermarking applies to all text outputs, including code. It’s just much less effective since code is low entropy.
68.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Cool post. Having text animations on a blog post is REALLY distracting for me tho.
69.
by demibabs 2mo ago
You can backspace
70.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Goated domain
71.
by demibabs 2mo ago
“Claude, spend the next 10 hours trying to solve the Reimann Hypothesis”. I agree that incentives are misaligned but there’s several competing model providers. If one gets funny with their costs people will jump ship, especially if the gap
72.
by demibabs 2mo ago
How else would they bill tho? Their operating cost is per token.
73.
by demibabs 2mo ago
The qualifier is there because it changes the outputs, so it’s necessarily true that some outputs will be worse. But it’s just as likely to make an output better. Take the example from the article. He complains that watermarking might somet
74.
by demibabs 2mo ago
> we have no idea how long anthropic plans on storing the digital copy, if at all. A lot of people assume they would for future training, but you don't know that. Books are considered super high quality training data. Anthropic has
75.
by demibabs 2mo ago
These companies are buying from small book stores; surely these collector types would know if they lost any one-of-a-kinds? Or at least someone would be keeping track of extremely rare books disappearing (especially now since this matter ha
76.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Wow, can’t believe they finally acquiesced on this
77.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Good article, but I still feel unsatisfied because even it cannot find an example of a book that’s actually been lost because of the destructive scanning frenzy (it only lists books that hypothetically could be lost because there’s not ma
78.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Soon people are going to start putting their height in their bio.
79.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Moralizing? Can you expand on that
80.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Appreciate your summary of this summary of the economist’s summary of the paper.
81.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Also, why are people acting like Anthropic digitizing and destroying a rare book is what makes it inaccessible to the public? If they were simply buying the books and doing nothing with them, the public wouldn’t be able to access their copi
82.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Watermarking doesn’t affect writing quality (on average) as long as the implementation is correct.
83.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Ironically, the “summary of the situation” linked within this article seems clearly written with AI.
84.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Yeah, I don’t get it. Do people want actual journalism to go out of business?
85.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Agreed, link should definitely be changed (or just the post removed)
86.
by demibabs 2mo ago
What does the malicious code actually do?
87.
by demibabs 2mo ago
> He writes about how he almost "destroyed" a subdiscipline in mathematics by becoming so good at it that he outclassed everyone. PhD students were advised to stay away from the whole field. This is hilarious lmao
88.
by demibabs 2mo ago
> The basic requirement is whether the source code is available - and made available. Are you certain that Google's solution here is ensuring that the source code is easily made available? The word “easily” sure did sneak into this
89.
by demibabs 2mo ago
Can someone explain what this means? Am not familiar with the terminology
90.
by demibabs 2mo ago
couldn't this inadvertently make the model dumber? if these kinds of words are what lets it "think".

More ›