delinka

16 ms·

121.
by delinka 7y ago
>...the lawyerese is the source code... Inasmuch as that's even possible, yes. The problem is that even this "language" is open to interpretation by courts.
122.
by delinka 7y ago
Seems more like “how not to...” > Conclusion - I think the Redlock algorithm is a poor choice...
123.
by delinka 7y ago
This was posted "one hour ago" while item you linked in the comment is "32 minutes ago" - unless time flows differently for you, the other is not earlier. However, the other is not a press release. So ... whatever.
124.
by delinka 7y ago
Not until long after you’ve spent it on everything else.
125.
by delinka 7y ago
Tracked by whom? Sounds to me what you have is a system that assumes you'll be reliable and reports negatively when you're not. That's fine. But it's still a system that tracks that your ability to handle debt.
126.
by delinka 7y ago
Sure, you have the money to cover those expenses. But will you? Simply inheriting the money doesn't answer that question. Receiving the money speaks nothing about your ability to manage it correctly.
127.
by delinka 7y ago
> > Your net worth would skyrocket, but your credit score wouldn’t budge. Seems fishy, doesn’t it? Not at all. 1) no one knows I inherited that money unless I tell them (ok, the bank and the IRS do - the bank can't announce it, t
128.
by delinka 7y ago
All the sibling answers are pretty much spot on except for one thing: you're building your credit score ; you're setting a track record for your ability to repay debt. Certainly, something similar exists in your neighborhood&#x2F
129.
by delinka 7y ago
I propose that it would require a minor change in web browsers only. Consider that we have 'incognito' and 'private browsing' sessions. The implementations are slightly different between browsers (e.g. Firefox appears to
130.
by delinka 7y ago
> If you know why our macOS users use _main I'd love to know. You'll find this on Linux, too. You'll notice the compiler (on POSIX systems?) prefixes your symbol names with _ since The Dawn Of Time.
131.
by delinka 7y ago
> Copyright: all the source code is rewritten so there is no copyright there. ...there is no copyright infringement . You own copyright on the things you create (or your employer does when hired by them to do such work.) You infringe ot
132.
by delinka 7y ago
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/installation/#bui...
133.
by delinka 7y ago
also "alter" - think "planting evidence"
134.
by delinka 7y ago
Summary: FBI accepted a sample of tissue and hair, agreed to analyze it (within FBI policy- that they not only support criminal investigations and other law enforcement agencies, but also, at their discretion, may perform analyses for other
135.
by delinka 7y ago
So dividing by number of months, which is not dividing by an amount of money.
136.
by delinka 7y ago
but no one in the nuclear engineering industry is involved in building any part of a drone
137.
by delinka 7y ago
@dang: can we get an appropriate title change?
138.
by delinka 7y ago
The idea, presumably, is that the "finder's fee" is money paid to the bank for finding money laundering, and that fee outweighs the profits from the transactions themselves. "Fees" are not levied against an institut
139.
by delinka 7y ago
>If they're focused on and used for recording an individual granted asylum... Was that the purpose? Were there no security cameras before? If this was a new installation, was he aware of it? Did the placement of the new cameras take
140.
by delinka 7y ago
Indeed a typo that I didn't catch until after the edit window.
141.
by delinka 7y ago
This is not a "hack." This is using the phone as designed.
142.
by delinka 7y ago
> ... if you told it not to. FTFY By default, Win96 would run that CD. You didn't tell it to. You had to go change the setting from the default. You had to tell Win95 to not autorun a CD.
143.
by delinka 7y ago
Sure they can. They can physically make it happen. Put money in the right hands and it happens. Morally, ethically, legally questionable. But certainly not impossible. I'm sure they'd just fire the executive(s) in question first.
144.
by delinka 7y ago
But the drivers have the option to use another platform to get rides; they're not forced to stay on Uber only. They may also choose their own hours, Uber does not dictate when they must turn their apps on.
145.
by delinka 7y ago
If I owned the company, I'd rather buy vehicles (with which I can reasonably control costs) and provide the vehicle to the driver employee. My second option, as owner, is to offer a fixed reimbursement - per mile, per minute, whatever
146.
by delinka 7y ago
Extradition not required. Start threatening their business in these countries. They could try something like "no Boeing aircraft in our airspace" while they refuse to cooperate. Get their local allies on board with a similar ban,
147.
by delinka 7y ago
That's the computer's problem, not the printer's. If rendering time really becomes an issue, it can start the rendering process while the humans are twiddling about with card reader terminals and making small talk.
148.
by delinka 7y ago
I think this debate is interesting, but I don't expect Apple to be happy about the final outcome. A developer publishing solely on Apple's App Store (and relying solely on Apple features to provide functionality) has no direct acc
149.
by delinka 7y ago
>How are they going to even know? Because it's a non-standard key with print on it: "Property of X, not to be copied without permission" and because it's a non-standard key, to even get the blanks requires knowing who
150.
by delinka 7y ago
You're missing a critical part of the equation: the inexperienced software engineer. Inexperienced software engineers are less expensive, so you can hire more for your payroll budget. These juniors tend to think "yeah, that sounds

More ›