deiptx

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by deiptx 6d ago

   I had not read the proof or any part of it because it is LLM generated. Most mortals won't for the same reason. It looked to me as if Prof. Mantova stepped from the crowd to get some credit which was not given. But maybe he did not car
2. 2.▲
   by deiptx 6d ago

   Would it be possible for an employee to leak weights?
3. 3.▲
   by deiptx 7d ago

   Following your analogy it is not a very fair game if it allows winning for those having access to latest exploits. Playing against skiddies who bought the hack kind of ruins it. I read your comment and my edit was inspired by it. Your artic
4. 4.▲
   by deiptx 7d ago

   Is the author suggesting that understanding has no value? because this is what I could gather from reading this. Edit: Another depressing fact is that he generously paid to LLM megacorps while piggy backing on human help for free and in the
5. 5.▲
   by deiptx 25d ago

   I am very new to this but applying human intuition this still feels like cheating. Knowing all the question that will be on the exam and working on understanding them even if you are never given answers will obviously give you and edge.
6. 6.▲
   by deiptx 1mo ago

   I find it highly ironic that his is the second article on the main page right after "avoid building technologies that could be used by a police state".