defg

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by defg 12y ago

   I have a few years of experiene with Haskell, and recently started Nimrod. It's an imperative language, so the differences are huge of course. I'm more productive in Nimrod. The syntax is great, similar to Python. Nimrod compiles
2. 2.▲
   by defg 12y ago

   http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n05/andrew-ohagan/ghosting
3. 3.▲
   by defg 12y ago

   And a functional version in Nimrod: https://gist.github.com/def-/ccef8bb54170b639c497
4. 4.▲
   by defg 12y ago

   As some people noticed this was broken. Fixed version is not quite as fast, but still faster than functional C++: Goats Wolves Lions C++11 Nimrod 17 55 6 0.00 0.03 117 155 106 0.17 0.13 217
5. 5.▲
   by defg 12y ago

   I was curious how a non-functional version would fare, so I wrote one in Nimrod and it's a lot faster than the functional C++: https://gist.github.com/def-/8187448ea7a5c8da8265 Goats Wolves Lions C++11 Nim
6. 6.▲
   by defg 13y ago

   Argh, someone beat us to it. We have a massive-multiplayer tournament planned for Saturday: http://ddnet.tw/#news