deeviant

44 ms·

421.
by deeviant 6y ago
I dunno. I feel dropbox has been getting less and less usable as their UI tries to get further away from the very light wrapper around windows explorer(or whatever file explorer your OS of choice uses). I really just wanted it to be a folde
422.
by deeviant 6y ago
I have found conservative bastions to be some of the least respective of 1A rights. Case and point, r/conservative on reddit. You literally have to be a conservative ("flared user") to even comment on the vast majority of p
423.
by deeviant 6y ago
> However, now that the precedent is set, I would expect the bar to be lowered going forward. Why is that? In general, a slippery slope argument is a poor one. > Even for businesses that are not in such politically charged areas, I ca
424.
by deeviant 6y ago
I feel that you are either unwilling or unable to respond to or absorb a single point I make. Sorry I couldn't connect, but this discussion is moot.
425.
by deeviant 6y ago
> QAnon, as malignant as it is, is a relatively small movement even among Trump supporters - probably around 1/4 of his followers. I have, very much to the destruction of my soul, looked thedonald.win. It's filled to the brim w
426.
by deeviant 6y ago
I specifically said (Trump|QAnon). It's pretty hard to tell the average trump supporter apart from the average QAnon supporter. And you could look at my comments and those who commented in return to find your 3-4 posters. That's p
427.
by deeviant 6y ago
The irony of a Trump supporter claiming projection and hypocrisy. These are literally the founding principles of Trumpism. And yes, your comment was clear example of whataboutism.
428.
by deeviant 6y ago
To be fair, at this moment in time, the vast majority of likely users for a project like this, *are* the Trump/Qanon crowd that feel dejected that they will be held to any sort of accountability for their inflammatory rhetoric, lies an
429.
by deeviant 6y ago
Don't be so sure. Trump-Qanon supporters seem to be pretty common around here. They were very active in the "Trump banned from twitter" post. Doesn't surprise me as (Trump|QAnon)'ism seems to be very inviting to the
430.
by deeviant 6y ago
The research overwhelming supports that those that drink coffee regularly, live longer. The caffeine may not be the cause, but rather other parts of coffee (this is generally the accepted view), but it is also true that most people in this
431.
by deeviant 6y ago
Whataboutism is perhaps the most ignorant defense used by Trump supporters.
432.
by deeviant 6y ago
They are playing the "Yes judge, he said the man would make an Excellent Cadaver, but he only meant that he hoped the man lives out his natural life in good health and turns into a good looking corpse in a completely natural sense&quot
433.
by deeviant 6y ago
There is no point, the dude is lost to reality.
434.
by deeviant 6y ago
Not really. It's so obvious that the only person that would likely disagree with me is person that will likely disagree with reality, but here I go anyways. Trump called for insurrection. He didn't call for a protest. So did Tru
435.
by deeviant 6y ago
No.
436.
by deeviant 6y ago
Facebook, and it's tendency to create fake reality bubbles around its users in the name of the all important "engagement", is perhaps more responsible for the sorry state of US politics and democracy then Trump himself.
437.
by deeviant 6y ago
If caffeine is bad for you, why does nearly every study that looks in to tea or coffee drinking find that it reduces all-cause mortality?
438.
by deeviant 6y ago
How does it make China more liable. Allowing wet markets to exist is a equal or greater threat than shoddy research labs.
439.
by deeviant 6y ago
> Transferring 2700 megajoules of energy to an f150 via gasoline in a few minutes is very convenient, something that would take a Tesla a few hours. A 75% charge can happen in ~20 minutes on something like a 250kw Telsa super charger. Ba
440.
by deeviant 6y ago
Are you using the reddit re-design? Because don't.
441.
by deeviant 6y ago
> Not only is the premise of the tenuous analogy likely completely wrong (the preponderance of evidence suggests eating “mostly plants” is, in fact, anywhere from bad to terrible for you... Where did you get that information, foster farm
442.
by deeviant 6y ago
I actually think the bugs/performance issues are helping CDPR right now. Everybody is talking about them rather than how bad the game actually is. The combat is simplistic. The AI opponents are basically broken. The quickhack system do
443.
by deeviant 6y ago
> Combat is like someone took Mass Effect 1 and combined it with a bunch of Bethesda bugs from Fallout and Skyrim. And removed any semblance of a working cover system.
444.
by deeviant 6y ago
> How else would you phrase someone telling you "I have this bug and will exploit it if you don't pay me X amount" Hello Strawman! > The second case would routinely cause a further review in any decent program We litera
445.
by deeviant 6y ago
> You're ignoring the fact that vertical farms have layers. In this article, they are growing 14 layers, so to match the output of one acre of farmland requires 1/14 of an acre of building, if all else is the same. I also used
446.
by deeviant 6y ago
Average cost of acre of farm land in US: $3160 Average cost of a cheap warehouse in US (this is being generous as the cost is likely far higher for a vertical farm) $20 square ft [1] Thus, Land/building cost standard farming method: $3
447.
by deeviant 6y ago
> But it only creates a significant explosion if the building is intact, which it wasn't at that point Totally clueless. Unlike you, I'm not just making stuff up. If you drop gigawatts of thermal energy into a body of water, yo
448.
by deeviant 6y ago
> No, the building doesn't appear to have been structurally sound enough to have enabled a larger pressure explosion than it suffered. The steam explosion would have resulted if they were unable to prevent the core from melting thro
449.
by deeviant 6y ago
I'm sure it does but in the UK, there is no Citizens United, where the Supreme Corporate Court of America (LLC) decided $$$ = speech, more $$$ = more speech, thus infinite $$$ to political campaigns = ALL GOOD HOMIES (This isn't
450.
by deeviant 6y ago
So you are attempting to make the point that the UK is not an equivalent democracy? The house of lords can not create bills nor stop them. They can look over the elected parliament's shoulders and whine, that's it. It is a vestigi

More ›