deeviant

31 ms·

331.
by deeviant 5y ago
You seem to have failed to comprehend my comment. It has nothing to do with grammar, but rather the "I take no responsibility for the content of my post" (my summary of their wording), part.
332.
by deeviant 5y ago
I'm I broken in some sort of way where I read: > Neither the Oxford Protein Informatics Group nor I accept any responsibility for the content of this post. And just stopped. I get it that you don't want to speak for your employ
333.
by deeviant 5y ago
I am dyslexic, I swap words like that frequently, shit happens. But if that is all you have to add to this discussion, I wonder why you bothered.
334.
by deeviant 5y ago
The study cited to me in order to defend the point that EVs make more particulate pollution flat out found that EV's create less particulate pollution. > A positive relationship exists between vehicle weight and non-exhaust emission
335.
by deeviant 5y ago
Idk, if you bothered to read the study that you are pointing to in your coup de grace, you'd would realize your cited sources admit that EV's create no more particulate pollution than ICE engines. Your cited study actually states
336.
by deeviant 5y ago
What is the value of such a prediction?
337.
by deeviant 5y ago
> which is made worse by EVs due to their weight? What a ridiculous supposition. First the weight difference is not that huge, second EV's use regenerative breaking for a huge portion of their breaking spectrum bypassing break pads
338.
by deeviant 5y ago
Hard disagree. Because tedious and long is absolutely orthogonal to "easier to understand". There is a reason why one letter/number variables are basically verboten in best practice.
339.
by deeviant 5y ago
It's not the word, it's the idea. Changing the word doesn't change the idea. We don't need new words, we need new ideas.
340.
by deeviant 5y ago
So you would choose not use the vaccine and let covid run rampant for 2023?
341.
by deeviant 5y ago
Is it easier to use? Or just it just look pretty to a subset of people?
342.
by deeviant 5y ago
> For now, the device has only been tested in rats. Right, I'll be sure to check back in 10-15 years.
343.
by deeviant 5y ago
I haven't heard of a single case of long covid after being fully vaccinated, have you?
344.
by deeviant 5y ago
> I feel like I've been playing against it a lot in chess.com, with the tremendous amount of cheating that is going on online, every 1 out of 6 or 7 games is an engine user This statement seems a bit funny because in order to have a
345.
by deeviant 5y ago
Then they get a cancer treatment, that was likely partially funded by the government via grant or tax benefit or medicare graft but fully owned by the private company, they are charged tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of dolla
346.
by deeviant 5y ago
Please do share the numbers backing up your naked statement.
347.
by deeviant 5y ago
> And the economics aren't that good. I'm going to need see some numbers on this statement. Because from where I'm sitting, the potential market is every human on planet earth , which is a pretty large amount of sales. P
348.
by deeviant 5y ago
I really wish this would be a higher priority for the current class of billionaire philanthropists: open source science. Medical research guided by the idea of preventing disease rather than creating expensive life-long treatments, and prio
349.
by deeviant 5y ago
> You said that all cause mortality increases on a ketogenic diet, and this study shows no such thing. ... > The risks of all-cause and cause-specific death over an average 6.4-year follow-up rose with each fall in carbohydrate intake
350.
by deeviant 5y ago
> Another crappy diet study. Correlation does not equal causation, etc. etc. It’s well known that these sorts of studies have innate problems If you think scientists don't know that correlation does not imply causation, I'm h
351.
by deeviant 5y ago
Sounds great until you realize that although some health markers improve on a ketogenic diet, all cause mortality significantly increases: https://www.escardio.org/The-ESC/Press-Office/Press-releases...
352.
by deeviant 5y ago
I work for Blue River Technology, now fully owned by John Deere. Obligatory: Any opinions I express on HN are my own and not representative of my employer.
353.
by deeviant 5y ago
I think that looks a lot more like the right direction. I would say that the precision part of Ag robotics is the most important part and the success of this project is likely going to be resting on that entirely. It boils down to something
354.
by deeviant 5y ago
Oh hey this is my industry (robots in agriculture). I don't like this. It feels way too "Juicero" to me. Too cute, to inconsequential. It feels likely one would spend more time on building and maintaining this thing than work
355.
by deeviant 5y ago
> Are you really so arrogant to think that other people are too lazy and stupid to think of your brilliant idea and that you are simply more intelligent than everybody else? Do you really think people haven't been trying? I find it
356.
by deeviant 5y ago
Da, it's the ALIENS.
357.
by deeviant 5y ago
> Incidentally, the author seems to use some strange 'İ' character (a capital I with a dot over it) a lot. I'm not sure why. This is because the author is actually a fractal within a 420-dimensional LSD hypercube, the &#x2
358.
by deeviant 5y ago
I'm sorry, but this is a pile of mumbly-bumbly.
359.
by deeviant 5y ago
Of course, I think I can help. What is trying to be communicated here is psychographic content will be delivered via standard device substrates existing in well aligned usage patterns that will no doubt delight the end-user with value. Meta
360.
by deeviant 5y ago
Yes, agreed. I wasn't meaning to be dismissive of those that enjoy or make use of these types of game modes, but really just invoking how hardcore mode ends up on average with the average user for analogy only.

More ›