deepsquirrelnet

8 ms·

1.
by deepsquirrelnet 8d ago
I'm not sure anybody but people inside the company know if the model itself is a contribution. There's no publication and no architectural details. There's no benchmarks or comparisons published. You can do all of the thing
2.
by deepsquirrelnet 10d ago
No. Frontier AI companies need the government to shield them from becoming commodity. That's why they're begging for regulation. On the other side, the current administration also has powerful backers whose businesses are compleme
3.
by deepsquirrelnet 11d ago
Wow, how could this have happened right before the election? Surely this will not be used as a pretext for anything.
4.
by deepsquirrelnet 11d ago
The problem is that at the business level and at least for a large part of the US government, we need to assume that there are no 'good' actors. Anthropic needs regulation in order to prevent AI from becoming a commodity. This of
5.
by deepsquirrelnet 18d ago
It's also clearly the wrong question for this decade. Private / public sector cooperation and all of the barriers between them that have been degraded and chipped away has left us with a very broken economic system that looks less
6.
by deepsquirrelnet 21d ago
They wouldn't provide results. You'd only get conclusions that were made from the beginning.
7.
by deepsquirrelnet 1mo ago
One only needs to read Stevens' dissent in hindsight to recognize that all of his concerns were and are legitimate, and the worst of which have come to pass. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC#Dis
8.
by deepsquirrelnet 2mo ago
> Republican strategists are expecting over 150 million to be spent on this race Imagine the assurances that are made to convince donors it's worth it. Who exactly bears the cost of unpopularity?...
9.
by deepsquirrelnet 2mo ago
People called Don and irrational hate of windmills. Name a more iconic duo...
10.
by deepsquirrelnet 2mo ago
Around 2015, my boss got permission from corporate to take me and a few of my coworkers to a leadership conference for a day. It was setup at a church and had religious theming around it, and a lot of "leadership values" were comm
11.
by deepsquirrelnet 2mo ago
That's a good point and conventionally if benchmarks aren't run as "one shot", it is denoted as "benchmark@K". Inference time scaling has historically shown improvement. Generally though, many of these fairness
12.
by deepsquirrelnet 2mo ago
If you look at papers on benchmarks, they're usually created to expose gaps in how models are trained. It should be no surprise that models get better on them over time, because you can't get better at what you don't measure.
13.
by deepsquirrelnet 2mo ago
Praise FSM. Without circular investments we'd all be broke.
14.
by deepsquirrelnet 2mo ago
China is doing open models better. I think there's little going in Hagueseth's head other than the usual reactionary nationalism reflex.
15.
by deepsquirrelnet 3mo ago
I think it's hilarious. LinkedIn is rushing to de-legitimize themselves so hard that they're inventing a new market for someone else to step into. Apparently indeed doesn't want to take it... not sure what's going on the
16.
by deepsquirrelnet 3mo ago
> You've used 92% of your Fable 5 limit · resets Jul 12, 12pm So generous.
17.
by deepsquirrelnet 3mo ago
Turns out it's easier to make conspiracies than effective policy. Who knew?
18.
by deepsquirrelnet 3mo ago
I think this is only accurate when no external ideas are used, but I'd like to suggest that nearly all new discovery is built on a combination of old ideas and LLMs are really good at the latter. If you bring something new to the table
19.
by deepsquirrelnet 3mo ago
Bingo. Value is the operative word here. Money and privacy are valuable too, and I'm assuming that there must be some pitch deck somewhere that is presumably good and selling city councils on this. Where is it? What is the value we&#x2
20.
by deepsquirrelnet 3mo ago
Can anybody find trustworthy stats that these actually reduce crime? All I see are occasional anecdotes about how they were used to find one person one time. Skeptical me seriously doubts this is an effective solution for crime. But maybe t
21.
by deepsquirrelnet 3mo ago
> Because I love swiping, but all my problems with it come from the fact that the QWERTY layout is far from ideal for it. I am 100% willing to learn a new layout if anyone will develop an optimal one for English so that swiping has a 99.
22.
by deepsquirrelnet 3mo ago
I'd been working with language models for several years before LLMs were a solution to this kind of problem. These are some ideas "off the top of my head" about how you can do classification in various ways. There's real
23.
by deepsquirrelnet 3mo ago
If you want to go deeper on language models, try these project ideas: - Zero-shot encoders like tasksource or GliNER - Natural language inference: https://huggingface.co/blog/dleemiller/nli-xenc-ways-to-use - GRPO
24.
by deepsquirrelnet 4mo ago
The first step to regulatory capture is getting yourself regulated...
25.
by deepsquirrelnet 4mo ago
> Unions exist to benefit the median and bring up the floor, but it stifles competition among those who really do desire to be at the top. And in doing so while it brings up the floor, it also brings down the ceiling because people who w
26.
by deepsquirrelnet 4mo ago
Baked into that is a presumption of justice, which is becoming comically out of touch to the point where that overused phrase could be a meme.
27.
by deepsquirrelnet 4mo ago
That’s even a bit optimistic. We can’t agree that all people with full time jobs should be able to afford the basics for their own survival.
28.
by deepsquirrelnet 4mo ago
Flock is only one company. Someone in my town smashed one from a different company and was treated like a hero in Facebook comments. It’s not mentioned in the article.
29.
by deepsquirrelnet 4mo ago
Not that I’d want to work there given what they do, but every time I’ve been contacted by a recruiter there, it seems like it’s within a month of a mass layoff they’ve had… which is maybe just because they seem to have mass layoffs every qu
30.
by deepsquirrelnet 5mo ago
Professionally, he spells his name thusly: FBI Director Ka$h Patel, so you know he’s serious.

More ›