debunkit

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by debunkit 10y ago

   > Did you create this account only to comment on this story? (just curious) Yes i did, usually i just let certain topics pass by me and never comment here. RF-cavities though are the very core to my line of research, so my acceptance for
2. 2.▲
   by debunkit 10y ago

   Yes, and the is the point. NASA would have had the means to eliminate most of those sources of errors. I wouldn't call these measurement errors though -> the measurement is fine - your setup is the source of error. But they decided
3. 3.▲
   by debunkit 10y ago

   I am blaming them for not being up to date on the state of the art and not following up on earlier research, especially on what has been hinted at in: https://tu-dresden.de/ing/maschinenwesen/ilr/rfs/ress
4. 4.▲
   by debunkit 10y ago

   Thanks for posting a link to the paper!
5. 5.▲
   by debunkit 10y ago

   There was a very elaborate experiment in Germany regarding this. They concluded that the force is excerted by coupling the RF-energy from the outside. If the system is fully self-contained (driven by a battery physically connected to the ca