Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
debugnik
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
361.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
Nice find, thanks! Turns out Godot reached to Miguel de Icaza for a few grants from Microsoft for C# integration around 2017-2020. Coincidentally , I can't find any mention of Microsoft grants for Godot after de Icaza left MS. I guess
362.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
And I bet those green threads still need an IO type of some sort to encode anything non-pure, plus usually do-syntax. Comparing merely concurrent computations to I/O-async is just weird. In fact, I suspect that even those green threads
363.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
> Languages that don't make a syntactical distinction (such as Haskell) essentially solve the problem by making everything asynchronous What the heck did I just read. I can only guess they confused Haskell for OCaml or something; th
364.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
AFAIK Microsoft is not a Godot sponsor, if you mean in terms of money or time? The companies listed down in this page are Godot sponsors: https://godotengine.org/donate/ As for advocacy, Microsoft's "Game dev
365.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
Agreed. I don't dislike Rust as a language, but it annoys me how its practitioners add the "[written] in Rust" tagline to every single thing they do that's otherwise unrelated to Rust. Specially when their code or depend
366.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
It's just a pun on vibe coding, which is already a dumb term by itself. It's not that deep.
367.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
I don't think doxing means what you think it means but whatever. I also expected more of him than to spam ads, waste the time of maintainers and mods on multiple communities, and reply passive-aggressively to anyone asking him to tone
368.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
I assume he's well meaning because I've been seeing his posts for a few months already in the OCaml forums before this pattern of his started, but he's suddenly acting irrational and doubling down. There's no way I can p
369.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
AFAIK this can use both the new Hammer for Source 2 and its own Unity-like editor. Hammer is one of the few editors with actual level-design tools still maintained, most other engine's editors can't do much more than drop static m
370.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
More like Roblox at the moment. It could compete with Unity/Godot if they arrange a deal for standalone games with Valve, as it builds on top of Source 2.
371.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
He apparently pretended to not have written it despite its DNS pointing to his servers, and Certificate Transparency logs and Internet Archive all attributing the page to his domain. Compare the top comment thread in the first link above to
372.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
Even after the public call-outs you keep dropping blatant ads for your blog and AI in general in your PRs; there's no other word for them than ads. This is why I blocked you on the OCaml forum already. When I was a kid, every year I&#x
373.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
Describe the task you're waiting for as text, and let an LLM pick the number of seconds for each request. More expensive the better model you clearly need for this. There, your AI pitch.
374.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
Didn't they start using Unreal Engine for S&box, then pivoted? Something must have been better for them on the Source side.
375.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
Not at all! Looking at the package dates, distros have started shipping their own source builds during 2022-2024, starting with .NET 6-7.
376.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
Looks like I missed progress during the time I've been away from dotnet, thanks. I still had memories of having to install an MS repo for that.
377.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
Thanks for the reference. I had memories of having to install a Microsoft repository to install the SDK, that's an improvement.
378.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
I glad to read this. One of my long-term concerns with .NET, compared to other language ecosystems, is the risk that only Microsoft people might know how to build it and port it. Is any distro actually shipping .NET SDK packages built from
379.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
And companies considered high-risk will have to "contribute to the development of technologies to mitigate the risks relating to their services." Which sooner or later will involve another attempt at client-side scanning.
380.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
English link: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025...
381.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
To access that API you need a license as an authorised third-party provider (TPP), don't you? So in practice it is only for businesses capable of pushing through the bureaucracy.
382.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
The interpreter/jit has traditionally been considered part of a dynamic language runtime, arguably the major part, before JS-brained companies started to call their every repackaging of V8/JSC a runtime (which is technically corre
383.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
You don't need a shell to run executables either.
384.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
Both are by design. Array covariance is a common design mistake in OOP languages, which the designer of TypeScript had already done for C# but there they at least check it at runtime. And the latter was declared not-a-bug already IIRC. Type
385.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
First example: you're confusing the annotation for a cast, but it isn't; it won't work the other way around. What you're seeing there is array covariance, an unsound (i.e. broken) subtyping rule for mutable arrays. C# ha
386.
▲
by
debugnik
10mo ago
Not really, I provided these examples a couple weeks ago on another HN thread. TypeScript is simply unsound. https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?#code/MYewdgzgLgBAllApg... https://www.typescriptlang.o
387.
▲
by
debugnik
11mo ago
The problem is that verifying adulthood for the remaining online spaces risks making them non-anonymous as well.
388.
▲
by
debugnik
11mo ago
You aren't, but you might have woken up from a decade long coma. This isn't new at all.
389.
▲
by
debugnik
11mo ago
According to Wikipedia, now Apple, Google, Microsoft, Samsung, WhatsApp and Facebook all use a water pistol. X was the only platform to roll that back.
390.
▲
by
debugnik
11mo ago
Advertising has existed for centuries, I'm sure it can survive as an industry without requiring invasive tracking.
More ›