deadeye

11 ms·

91.
by deadeye 3y ago
I feel like everyone with kids had this idea for an app, but not too many people actually did it. Nice job.
92.
by deadeye 3y ago
Where is that? There are lots of regional issues.
93.
by deadeye 3y ago
I'm starting to realize that secular culture has created a void that is leaving people unfulfilled. Yet I'm still struggling to become a believer myself.
94.
by deadeye 3y ago
I disagree with the articles thesis and was about to make all the points you listed here. Thanks for being critical even though you disagree.
95.
by deadeye 3y ago
See my above response. Admitting that your political adversaries aren't "bad", just "dumb", isn't exactly conciliatory.
96.
by deadeye 3y ago
The thesis of the article is that liberals are not "good" and conservative are not "bad", but that liberals are "educated" and conservatives are not. And the article questions, "Maybe liberals are bad beca
97.
by deadeye 3y ago
Zero self awareness, as usual for the NYT.
98.
by deadeye 3y ago
So, this works frame by frame using SD, extracting a pose (for example) and generating a new frame using the prompt and the pose, then re-encoding gen'd frames as a video? Seems interesting. Any demos?
99.
by deadeye 3y ago
What could you possibly mean? Government made it so much better. How else would you know that the cookies (you're going to consent to anyway) are being put on your computer?
100.
by deadeye 3y ago
When the worst of both parties get together, you know nothing good can come of it.
101.
by deadeye 3y ago
"That’s what the journalists are there for though - to do double checks and verify sources. This is CNN, no?" Is this sarcasm? Seriously, I can't tell.
102.
by deadeye 3y ago
Consider the fact that there are thousands of environmental predictions. Are some right? Of course, some are. Perhaps only due to the fact that some HAD to be right given a normal distribution of predictions. That could just be survivor
103.
by deadeye 3y ago
That only makes sense if the predictions are accurate and highly probable. Time unfortunately, has shown that these dire predictions are often wrong. There has been a good 20 years of climate hysteria to pull from. All one has to do is lo
104.
by deadeye 3y ago
"If this ocean current is collapsing because of the current temperature anomaly, then it has happened." It must be my reading comprehension that's off, but what has happened? What is "it", the ocean current collaps
105.
by deadeye 3y ago
I, for one, applaud you for saying the quite part out loud.
106.
by deadeye 3y ago
If the lights are on at SO then they must be in the process of training their own AI with their own dataset and documentation for the topics covered. That is what it would take for me to make SO my first stop again. It should be very doab
107.
by deadeye 3y ago
Didn't they get the memo. 100+ million people signed up...but no one uses it.
108.
by deadeye 3y ago
This aged well.
109.
by deadeye 3y ago
People pointing at 100+ million sign-ups for thread don't seem to understand the reasoning behind it. They think it is a reflection on Twitter. I doubt it.
110.
by deadeye 3y ago
This is hilariously bad reporting.
111.
by deadeye 3y ago
I suppose that is true as a baseline understanding of life. I should have inserted the word "voluntarily" in that sentence to be more explicit.
112.
by deadeye 3y ago
I'm not sure this is the forum to provide evidence to what is obviously true. Around 1950 the global emissions of co2 from human causes was about 5 billion tons. It explodes after 1950, hockey stick like growth and is now about 35 bill
113.
by deadeye 3y ago
I'm saying, if what humans had done to the planet by 1950 had caused levels of climate change that could be known and forcasted without advanced tools and research, then what we have done since should be way more observable without adv
114.
by deadeye 3y ago
$20 a month?
115.
by deadeye 3y ago
Climate science is not as causal as you suggest.
116.
by deadeye 3y ago
I got that error today. It went away after logging out then in.
117.
by deadeye 3y ago
This is garbage, top to bottom. First, arguing that we "knew" about climate change before satellites, major expansion of energy consumption, and advanced computer models is counter productive at best to the human caused climate ch
118.
by deadeye 3y ago
Is vice bankrupt yet? I mean, financially, not ethically. That ship sailed long ago.
119.
by deadeye 3y ago
Is this more than a username land grab?
120.
by deadeye 3y ago
I was speaking to the ideas as outlined in the post. Unless you live like a savage, there will always be this issue of how technology hurts humans. This is why the story of Adam and Eve exists. It is an allegory on this very topic. Humans a

More ›