dds-dds

5 ms·

1.
by dds-dds 8mo ago
That's pretty much my point:) A new technology brought new ideas to a cultural discipline, new forms of music, twisting and morphing the old forms, especially in the hands of the naive, yet creative youth. I see the same opportunities
2.
by dds-dds 8mo ago
As an independent musician, I for one welcome our AI overlords. They should not be worried about any technology that needs a human to make it remotely interesting. They should not be worried if they aren't generic sounding independent
3.
by dds-dds 5y ago
I would counter that by saying Daphne Oram was the GOD mother of everything, and paved the way for Delia and women in general by actually starting the BBC Radiophonic Studio.
4.
by dds-dds 6y ago
Except that generally labels fork out the cost (invest) in their artists releases, good labels do anyway. I'm not convinced a Silicon Valley company with a turnover of $$$Million should be the most recommended option for labels and art
5.
by dds-dds 6y ago
This. It is known as acquiring taste, and mostly takes time and effort/research. I would also add that 'any' music you haven't heard before is new music, it doesn't have to be freshly minted to be new or relevant. A
6.
by dds-dds 7y ago
Must mention DBX and Anthony 'Shake' Shakir too, essential! (Detroit techno on HN! Very Alvin Toffler:D)).
7.
by dds-dds 8y ago
Just on the off-chance my long search for the right mixer helps anyone else: I own the Formula One FF-4000, which can be switched from fader to rotary by just a few screws and then swapping the board. (Provided you bought the optional bo