Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dddnzzz334
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
dddnzzz334
5y ago
Yes because Apple users are too stupid to manually install anything.
32.
▲
by
dddnzzz334
5y ago
It means losing the dictatorial control that the Indian government currently has over internet.
33.
▲
by
dddnzzz334
5y ago
It isn't about protecting the interest of the voters but about having power to shut down and censor internet at will that the Indian government doesn't want to lose.
34.
▲
by
dddnzzz334
5y ago
> he means 'ruin how he makes money using email No, it would ruin email in general. You are always in control of whether you want to read an email or not.
35.
▲
by
dddnzzz334
5y ago
That comparison doesn't make any sense. Earn.com was making people go through them in order to contact whoever used its service. It completely killed the open nature of email where if you had someone's email you could be sure the
36.
▲
by
dddnzzz334
5y ago
> In a democracy the only thing that matters is the mandate of the people. No it doesn't. Freedom of press and speech are a key component of democracy.
37.
▲
by
dddnzzz334
5y ago
> The state is legally allowed to spy BJP government was misusing this power to spy on its political opponents which is a clear misuse of power and a subversion of the democratic principles. > I do not think a court has any say in it.
38.
▲
by
dddnzzz334
5y ago
India falling in various democracy and freedom indexes [1][2] are definitely a benchmark. But of course, your next reply will be how flawed these indexes are and how the entire world has some vendetta against India. [1] https://e
39.
▲
by
dddnzzz334
5y ago
The BJP government was investigating its political enemies with the intent of subverting democracy and getting absolute and authoritarian control over India. The Judiciary is protecting the constitution and its principles. The BJP governmen
40.
▲
by
dddnzzz334
5y ago
> I don't know if this is what the judges said or if it is the Guardian's spin on what they said. The court did say this > "This is of particular concern when it relates to the freedom of the press, which is an importan