dd82

6 ms·

31.
by dd82 3y ago
It is exactly the same. You can absoutely be sued for copyright infringement in your example. https://www.adobe.com/legal/dmca.html Just because you produce an infringing work doesn't mean it will be discovered a
32.
by dd82 3y ago
tbh, any OOP paradigms used with db tables will end up in a clusterf*ck.
33.
by dd82 3y ago
its a lot of repetitive noise. Coming from other languages like python and java, this is a good example of normalization of deviance to me.
34.
by dd82 3y ago
- Simple and lots of duplicated code. Golang took DRY overuse and turned it on its head to be dupliate everthing everywhere - Its duplicated everywhere which means I need to mentally figure whether I need to figure out this path or ignore.
35.
by dd82 3y ago
would love to see some examples you cite. This pattern is prevalent in all golang I've seen, whether in libs or work. And I've only been working in the language full time for three months.
36.
by dd82 3y ago
its of course hyperbolic but frequent enough in any substantial codebase to be a wart on the language.
37.
by dd82 3y ago
So basically Marcus Licinus Crassus strategy for money making is still alive, 2000 years later.
38.
by dd82 3y ago
when you need long term stable storage without getting hit by bit rot
39.
by dd82 3y ago
Realistically, what do you expect the DA to say? As part of the job, admitting fault for anything pre-emptively goes against all the attributes that get you the job in the first place
40.
by dd82 3y ago
Is that because NOLA police used recognition as part of the investigation toolbox, not as an auto-arrest rubber stamp?
41.
by dd82 4y ago
for you, maybe. but not me. DD - disk destructor, double-down (a tire sidewall specification) SPA - single page application, specific purchase agreement, etc and the list goes on.
42.
by dd82 4y ago
https://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/english/products/645z/ says a 51MP CMOS sensor, and has been CMOS since 2015.
43.
by dd82 4y ago
or 'tick this box or you're not allowed to access X, Y and Z parts of the tooling". There's a big difference from functionality not existing to do this, and functionality existing that can change at any time. rsc's
44.
by dd82 4y ago
That works great for simple things. how do you tie a specific feature flag to a cross-engineering organization feature that's under rollout with input from multiple projects? django-waffle is an example of your approach, and worked pr
45.
by dd82 4y ago
yeah, if you zone out on a trail ride, you're getting dumped off the bike very quickly. For me, its the opposite, I find that just focusing on the trail (now and next) has the same mental effect.
46.
by dd82 4y ago
Your examples are why I really don't like road riding too much, and much prefer trail riding. Why don't you like MTB? The big reason I like it is because you need to focus on the now and next, you can't zone out, unlike with
47.
by dd82 4y ago
I disagree, many of them are likely on H1B visas, which are tied to employment and you need to find a job within a specific time range before the visa is revoked.
48.
by dd82 4y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegraph_key#Operators'_%22fi... > With straight keys, side-swipers, and, to an extent, bugs, each and every telegrapher has their own unique style or rhythm pattern when transmit
49.
by dd82 4y ago
working somewhere, briefly. not too much of a red flag working somewhere a while and thriving in that environment? But I get it, ethics can easily fly out the window when you choose, especially when there's alot of money in play to br
50.
by dd82 4y ago
>There are perfectly sensible business reasons why it is an unacceptable risk to have someone running around publicly "correcting" the CEO while having a position within the organization especially when the CEO is spouting a to
51.
by dd82 4y ago
Is that still your opinion after the past few days? His public behavior? Interesting that you and many others see this behavior as an admirable trait and not a regression.
52.
by dd82 4y ago
you can also talk with people who've worked there and are still there/left. Basically, you don't spend long at SpaceX if you find mudane things like a good WLB or enjoy being burnt out. The disagreement here is Twitter is a
53.
by dd82 4y ago
You really would want to work yourself down to nothing for the worlds richest man with extremely hand-wavy equity value? There's a difference between being in a focused envcironment and being in a shitshow. Essentially this message is
54.
by dd82 4y ago
Yep, but that seems to be the prevailing convention being asserted (pun intended) by many commenters.
55.
by dd82 4y ago
normally in a CI/CD pipeline, you'll see what asserts failed in the log output. Github Actions with pytest shows the context of the failed asserts in the log output. TBH, thought this was standard behavior, do you have experienc
56.
by dd82 4y ago
Right, and not many actually do. with python and pytest, you could leverage difflib, but that's an additional thing that adds unnecessary complexity. My approach is simple enough, good enough, and doesn't require additional fudg
57.
by dd82 4y ago
one assert per test seems... as you said, indicative of zealotry. if you already have your object there, why not test for the changes you expect? So you have one test that indicates that a log error is outut. then another that tests that
58.
by dd82 4y ago
this has downsides if you're comparing attributes with a method result and checking whether said attrs match what you expect. Either you run each test N times for N attr comparisons, accepting the cost of setup/teardown, or do a
59.
by dd82 4y ago
not really. one thing this is useful for is extracting out various attributes in an object when you really don't want to compare the entire thing. Or comparing dict attributes, and figuring which one is the incorrect one. for example
60.
by dd82 4y ago
one bigger opinion I have is I really hope the engineers and people at this company get screwed royally by their product in the coming years. Since they're doing an excellent job of screwing people.

More ›