dd36

15 ms·

151.
by dd36 4y ago
A political campaign isn’t an order from the government. Until recently, intentionally misunderstanding the situation was an ineffective court strategy.
152.
by dd36 4y ago
Plus the US airs its dirty laundry in ways Russia, China, or the Middle East could never allow. Their power structures are too weak for actual freedom.
153.
by dd36 4y ago
You need to think of Twitter as MSNBC or Fox News. Bias in editorial decisions is perfectly legal.
154.
by dd36 4y ago
So if Fox News doesn’t cover Jared Kushner’s antics to your satisfaction, should all Fox News executives go to jail?
155.
by dd36 4y ago
See Fox News…
156.
by dd36 4y ago
Now political campaigns are the government? Would be curious on your take of what DeSantis was trying to do to Disney in FL? 30 years in prison for threatening Disney about its speech?
157.
by dd36 4y ago
Fortnite too.
158.
by dd36 4y ago
Monopoly.
159.
by dd36 4y ago
They can. Anyone that won’t should be shut down immediately.
160.
by dd36 4y ago
That would never fly with a real audit. You’d perform a triple tie out and the incoming cash transaction would have to be recorded. And you never do a single day.
161.
by dd36 4y ago
China wants internal conflict that weakens the country or destroys democracy. Social media can be weaponized to do this. Foreign media ownership limits are not novel.
162.
by dd36 4y ago
Absolutely. The FBI head must be appointed by the President and approved by the Senate. Oversight is performed by Congress. He can be fired.
163.
by dd36 4y ago
Not if it’s a psy op tool of an adversary.
164.
by dd36 4y ago
Or by radicalizing people to try to destroy democracy.
165.
by dd36 4y ago
The US is not better or worse than an autocracy?
166.
by dd36 4y ago
Or they have a common root?
167.
by dd36 4y ago
Not policing content would destroy Twitter.
168.
by dd36 4y ago
It already exists: newsgroups.
169.
by dd36 4y ago
It really needs a debug formula feature that allows you to look at a formula in a more readable format.
170.
by dd36 4y ago
What free speech was attacked?
171.
by dd36 4y ago
Name a large company that has successfully done that recently?
172.
by dd36 4y ago
It’s not random chance to be hacked then have your emails woven into malicious conspiracies. It’s a crime. The DNC favored the Democrat over the independent. That’s to be expected. The voters picked Hillary. The conspiracy that it was stole
173.
by dd36 4y ago
The hacked and leaked DNC and Podesta emails and corresponding fever dreams of cheese pizza meaning child porn and all the other nonsense definitely affected some people. The DNC emails and conspiracies pushed on the left made a lot of Bern
174.
by dd36 4y ago
TV is about selling marketing. If a religious channel would draw 20 million viewers a night, someone would figure that out.
175.
by dd36 4y ago
The info on Russia gate is public record in courts, the special counsel report, inspector general report, etc. Russia supported Donald Trump.
176.
by dd36 4y ago
And AFAIK an anonymous political dissident wouldn’t want a blue checkmark? Furthermore, there can be layers of anonymity. There can be anonymous publicly but not to Twitter. That’s dangerous given that Twitter cannot protect your identity f
177.
by dd36 4y ago
That’s an opinion. I disagree with it. It’s a private corporation not the government. You either have people incentivized to self-identify with a checkmark or what? The alternative is to build an AI that identifies you in order to remove bo
178.
by dd36 4y ago
You named the only two relatively free, large, unmoderated public forums with transparent-able feeds. Well Reddit’s feed is transparent: Lower bound of Wilson score. On Twitter, I only filter for latest, but you cannot do that on Facebook.
179.
by dd36 4y ago
But isn’t that an indication that truly free peoples are less religious as opposed to a conspiracy? My whole life there have been religious cable news shows. If they were extremely popular, they’d air on prime time or their content would be
180.
by dd36 4y ago
Yes, the news recently that the FBI monitored Aretha Franklin?!? The same powerful people that targeted socialists or civil rights leaders also influenced or even owned the media. It’s almost like the internet, at least early on, kind of br

More ›