dcrazy

3 ms·

1.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
Apple cultivars are interesting because they are often developed by governments motivated to promote the existence of a healthy farming industry, not by private monopoly rights. Case in point, the Cripps Pink (aka Pink Lady) was developed b
2.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
Your opinion about the “validity” of such a case is not really at home in a thread about _legal standing_.
3.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
What you think you should be able to do with the data you get back from contacting Amazon’s servers doesn’t impact whether Amazon has standing to sue you over how and why you contacted their servers.
4.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
There’s a federal WARN act too. Neither the state nor federal versions gives the employees any legal right to try to change the business’s mind.
5.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
Amazon is a party to interactions with their website. That gives them standing to sue over those interactions. Whether they can sue Perplexity specifically is what was being debated in these motions.
6.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
Because David Ellison’s explicit plan is to run Warner Bros. Discovery (owners of CNN) and Paramount (owners of CBS) as two divisions within Skydance Media. He committed to keeping a 20-odd film slate at WBD as part of antitrust negotiation
7.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
This is over a month old, for anyone like me who was confused.
8.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
I’m saying that compiling Wi-Fi drivers from source is still representative of trying to run Linux on consumer hardware. Desktop Linux is like a kit plane. You can pay to have someone assemble it for you, but you still need to know how to g
9.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
Ah yes, they’re just holding it wrong.
10.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
If a union had managed to organize the most profitable-per-employee company in the video game industry, it would have been front-page news.
11.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
StarCraft: Ghost?
12.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
That was my point. My sarcasm mustn’t have come through.
13.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
I guess when people vote the same way, it’s technically a conspiracy?
14.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
No, you should fix your code to be compliant with ISO C. The optimizer isn’t going to wait for you to convince WG14.
15.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
lol
16.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
“Universal Voltronics” sounds the most made-up to me. But “Nuclear Defense Research Corporation of New Mexico, Inc.” takes the cake.
17.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
Hope dang comes in with a headline rewrite
18.
by dcrazy 2mo ago
Why, are we speed running the de-evolution of UI?
19.
by dcrazy 3mo ago
How has HF been making money so far?
20.
by dcrazy 3mo ago
Are you in the U.S.? As an American I use a credit card for nearly 100% of my purchases, on a daily basis. I pay my bill in full each month. I might pay a 2–3% surcharge on a subset of those purchases, but I am reasonably sure I get more th
21.
by dcrazy 3mo ago
The stubbornness of the Go standard library team knows no bounds.
22.
by dcrazy 3mo ago
Corroboration: crime on BART dropped when the new harder-to-jump fare gates went in.
23.
by dcrazy 3mo ago
> Every character, every skill point, every asset in every hangar, every ISK in every wallet was written in Python 2 code, and all of it must read back under Python 3 exactly as it was. This task would be even more challenging under such
24.
by dcrazy 3mo ago
Then please, do everyone a favor and describe the problem.
25.
by dcrazy 3mo ago
It is pathological for their utilization, as in “worst-case behavior.” Like how a program that makes and frees millions of differently-sized heap allocations is pathological for memory fragmentation.
26.
by dcrazy 3mo ago
It seems you’ve stumbled into the truth: a lot of things are only worth throwing LLMs at as long as the LLMs are cheap.
27.
by dcrazy 3mo ago
AOL minutes seem antiquated, but not absurd.
28.
by dcrazy 3mo ago
That is a pathological use case for OpenAI, and precisely why they have instituted these limits. Part of the tradeoff of doing your work on someone else’s computer is they get to set the rules about when you use it.
29.
by dcrazy 3mo ago
“In reality fossil fuel is crap and we don’t need it” The second half of that sentence is what makes it clearly an ideological assertion.
30.
by dcrazy 3mo ago
Asserting fossil fuels are crap betrays you as an ideologue, rather than someone who is solution-oriented. Fossil fuels have amazing energy density, fantastic refueling characteristics, and a highly developed production and delivery infra

More ›