Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dcow
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
51 ms
·
901.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
My point is not that reputation is a useless metric. It is that it’s only part of the equation and in this case probably misleading.
902.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
While I understand you’re trying to add some color to the claims so as to inform us to take them with a grain of salt, you’re also committing a logical fallacy. So what if the devil himself made the claim? Unless it’s verifiably absurd, yo
903.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Do you live in California? I know CA has much more consumer-friendly restrictions on sending medical bills to collections. It essentially can’t happen in CA.
904.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Hospitals and doctors don’t do this. It’s unethical to deny someone treatment because you’re not sure they can pay.
905.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
I need the next Reacher to drop, and soon.
906.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Pokemon as an entire game relies on artificial scarcity and psychological manipulation. It's just a fixed cost up front for the game (and arguably not even strictly so these days with Pokemon Go). Same with any game ever that has loot
907.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
The stock market is also gambling. Plenty of informed consenting adults visit casinos all the time. What's the "responsible adult" way to spend your discretionary entertainment budget these days? NFTs? Disney+? Binge drinking
908.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
I bet valve makes more off the hundreds of thousands of $2 transactions than the occasional $100 or $1000 transaction. I mean think about it...
909.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Because they value the content. Might not be your style, but participating in battle passes and cosmetic drops is enjoyable for many people. What else should they be spending their discretionary income on? Stonks?
910.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Or, maybe they just value the skins? Maybe they want to contribute financially to a game they really like in the hopes of keeping it healthy? I do know people that buy every new cosmetic that's released and they enjoy doing it. They ar
911.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
They're saying that unless you use actions, you don't get the cohesive cache and artifacts support. That replicating that in the cloud or locally is a PITA. Thus people are using the GH actions vendor specific tooling in that way.
912.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
It's also kinda a hallmark of a mature computer anything to use itself in some way. You bootstrap your compiler using another until you can self compile. You write a build tool plugin which uses an older version of itself to enhance
913.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Even if it's modeled with more compositional finesse in the code, you still need a UI level label for this combination of relationships in some culture where there's an appropriate term for it, so you still end up with some labe
914.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Search quality improves my life. Like actually I'm a happier searcher since Kagi and I search more frequently because I have increased confidence that I'll get meaningful results. I don't grumble like I used to every time I h
915.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Kagi has replaced DDG for me entirely. Now that you get unlimited searches, do you think it would for you, too?
916.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
I do think Kagi adds features that improve on what Google offered in its heyday and saying meh there's nothing new doesn't capture the full picture, but I generally understand your vibe.
917.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Which really makes you understand why the lgpl was a defeat.
918.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Bummer I missed the SAFE round. I would consider chipping in as an investor even though I wouldn't feel comfortable purchasing a preorder as a consumer. Wonder if you can structure your next round to include spots for people that misse
919.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
On a positive note, given a16z's feedback, I'm sure they can find another firm/partner that would be willing to back them at this stage. They are definitely in a hard position, though. Reading this I doubt I'd put money
920.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
It all depends on the license. There’s no umbrella ability to modify the source code of a software binary, open-source or proprietary, unless explicitly allowed.
921.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
No you cant.
922.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Section 3.a covers products you’ve made with the licensed technology. I don’t see any language about modifications to the licensed technology. Edit: I see some language covering this further up.
923.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
This essay lost the plot! There’s nothing about the whole situation that open source fixes. Your champion open source project can change its license and pricing too. The only way to protect yourself here is to enter into a non-ambiguous and
924.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
I’ve been asking the exact same question. There is so clearly a better way to have handled this whole thing it makes you wonder whether the person in charge of this transition is simply incompetent, or actually negligent. If I were a shareh
925.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Well yeah, that’s what is so mind boggling about the whole thing. They are trying to do something that’s likely illegal in terms of contract law. It’s also just abundantly stupid given the social cost. There was a super clean way to do the
926.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
When McDonalds increases the price of a McDouble the messes don’t send death threats to the CEO. Something that used to cost X increasing in price and now costing 1.2X is not unethical. I’m just trying to understand what it is in this case
927.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Okay I was talking about this with a few friends because it’s now a “debacle” and actually did the math. Unity is cheaper than Unreal across the board whether you release a $70 AAA or a $5 indie experiment. And that’s with worst case number
928.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Lookup "doing business as". Also your product's name, your domain name. your marketing slogans, taglines, trademarks, etc. do not have to match your incorporated name. Just use `dosaygo` everywhere... not sure what made you t
929.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Blizzard had a hardcoded exception in OSX (pre macOS) for the longest time.
930.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
> Granted, they don't have Nintendo's games Didn't Nintendo appear on stage at the 2016 keynote event to announce Nintendo's foray into mobile gaming (on 3rd party hardware, anyway) with Super Mario Run? And didn'
More ›