Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dcow
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
37 ms
·
661.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Yeah but I have more than enough available screen real estate for 70 chars. Seems like some pretty excessive padding on the page causes the lines to wrap much sooner than they should or something effectively similar.
662.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Looks like it renders correctly at 50% zoom.
663.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
I love systemd.
664.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Why is this stupid? It’s just an option for how to configure a system that uses systemd to allow commands to be run in a privileged execution context without a suid binary. What’s wrong with having options? Why don’t you propose a better so
665.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
I know. And it looks like this: https://imgur.com/a/jfbNCrO
666.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Why is the formatting so messed up? Page seems to be fixed width but not wide enough for an actual line so all lines soft wrap?…
667.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
It’s a 100% difference (;
668.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
They blanked cited a list of feely subjects. They did not describe actual problems. Workers, for instance, do not have the right to “not compete against an AI” (if that’s what’s being referenced). There are no copyright issues if people lic
669.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
But people are people.
670.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
You are supposed to use multiple passkeys or you can use a password manager to store and sync your passkeys cross platform. Your passkeys sync in iCloud they aren’t device bound, just platform bound. Passkey export import is being worked on
671.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
> These are real issues that exist right now, have no solutions, and all threaten various aspects of the fabric of society and our legal system. Can you share a few examples?
672.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
How did we get from AI LLMs to nuclear apocalypse? You’ve articulated my point better than I have, it seems (= Edit: I see you misinterpreted my comment. I should have been specific and said “any existing AI adjacent technology” in our hand
673.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
We all agree that there may be dragons. The “doomsday” question is whether we’re even remotely close to a dragon’s lair such that we should imminently worry about waking the dragon—risking it burning down the village. To each their own unti
674.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Charitably, nobody is arguing that AI shouldn’t be taken seriously. People are arguing about whether it will dismantle society and pave the way to the end of times. Surely we can agree that while there are valid indicators that we should tr
675.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Regarding God, it’s a rhetorical question meant to make the reader think about all the moral concerns raised by religious people and the ensuing arguments dismissing God by atheists, feminists, etc. An inversion of what is generally happeni
676.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
So we agree higher intelligence is capable. But, “Is that a bad doomsday scenario ?” is the next question. And then, “Is it so bad that society should fear these intelligence tools?” And to argue that, you have to get into a real abstrac
677.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Why does causing a moral panic have a lower burden of proof than dismissing a moral panic? Do you believe in God? (Also I didn't mean it to come off as both sides have made up concerns. I meant it as both the concern and lack thereof c
678.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
I can usually tell which programmers read man pages (generally RTFM) and which don’t. And I still `man ln` more frequently than I’d like to admit to make sure I get the argument order correct. > Consider a socialist who reads 500 liberal
679.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Right. There is no proof on either side—either that AI is capable of organically morphing into a super-intelligence or that it inherently isn’t. It’s not formal . It’s people burning cycles telling each other about their intrinsic risk tol
680.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
The author is frustrated that someone is essentially capable of saying: “based on my priors, this doesn't concern me”. > The best I can say is that sometimes people on my side make similar arguments (the nuclear chain reaction one)
681.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
You know what I mean, the TLS middleware is part of your IDS suite. Anyway. Personal use was not the norm. Locking machines down was. VPNs, corporate network perimeters, blocking copy paste (my god), TLS middleware boxes. It all sucks. And
682.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
I’ll admit I didn't make it clear how my comment was on topic. It is indeed a reaction to TFA. We need to protect this . This is beautiful in its own small way. And as it stands any number of the people who stepped up to help the son
683.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
These tools typically claim to block or catch stupidly high number of threats per unit time. And they usually bucket the drive-by stuff as a threat to achieve this narrative. I agree it’s hogwash. So you’re essentially admitting that these
684.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Well yeah this is what TFA is calling an ad. There’s either a clear anti Microsoft slant in the reporting, or this is a relevant useful “ad”.
685.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
You don’t seem to be understanding the nuance that public infrastructure is not a free market. We can opine about living in a libertarian paradise, but we don’t.
686.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
I get News+ stories on my home news widget that the system puts by default in the screen that you swipe all the way left to view.
687.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Before everyone pulls out the pitchforks… 1. Swipe down on your iOS home screen to bring up search. 2. Type the first few letters of a popular app that’s not on your phone. For me that’s “tik”. 3. Observe an advertisement from apple’s app s
688.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
Honest question: have you ever seen a corporate TLS middleware box stop an active threat? And I don’t mean drive-by crap like port scanning for sshd…
689.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
I get what you’re saying. I think you’re over simplifying. Building a bridge to a town of 10,000 is hardly nowhere. What you’re saying sounds like we should all just live in cheap concrete studio apartment complexes in one big city where we
690.
▲
by
dcow
3y ago
We’re not talking about economically inefficient ghost towns. We’re talking about large telco not being interested in building out fiber because the _profit_ wouldn’t make a blip on their spreadsheets and thus wouldn't drive the type o
More ›