dboon

5 ms·

61.
by dboon 8mo ago
Type the word porn. Self censorship is wrong.
62.
by dboon 8mo ago
You can't get perfection. The constraints / stakes are softer with what Mitchell is trying to solve i.e. it's not a big deal if one slips through. That being said, it's not hard to denounce the tree of folks rooted at th
63.
by dboon 8mo ago
Oops! Usually, I just post good stuff I find and the dupe detector catches it and does the thing where it redirects you to the existing post. Apologies!
64.
Vouch(github.com)
185 points by dboon 8mo ago|7 comments
65.
by dboon 8mo ago
…what? It is quite literally the opposite. This isn’t a matter of taste or perception.
66.
by dboon 8mo ago
I like your writing. Do you have a blog or publish anywhere else?
67.
by dboon 8mo ago
Ah, I understand. Yeah, it read to me as a "good thing" in the sense of "look, it's slow, but it has to be slow". That the complexity was inherent and therefore in some sense good.
68.
by dboon 8mo ago
It’s not a good thing, because it’s not a thing. The title is a sarcastic reference to the fact that it uses an order of magnitude more instructions per frame than SM64 did
69.
by dboon 8mo ago
Codex is not a good harness, but GPT-5.2 and related flavors produce, in my experience, better code than Opus 4.5, and by a surprising margin.
70.
Claude Code's renderer is more complex than a game engine(spader.zone)
40 points by dboon 8mo ago|15 comments
71.
What we learnt from speedrunning the Idea Maze(commoncog.com)
4 points by dboon 8mo ago|0 comments
72.
With AI, we don't practice fucked(spader.zone)
3 points by dboon 9mo ago|0 comments
73.
by dboon 9mo ago
Fantastic article! I wrote an ASCII renderer to show a 3D Claude for my Claude Wrapped[^1], and instead of supersampling I just decided to raymarch the whole thing. SDFs give you a smoother result than even super sampling, but of course you
74.
by dboon 9mo ago
I'm not OP, but send me an email. My address is in my HN profile. You and I are building the same thing, and I would love to have a chat.
75.
by dboon 9mo ago
https://spader.zone/
76.
Linkers and Loaders(os2museum.com)
24 points by dboon 9mo ago|2 comments
77.
by dboon 9mo ago
I use Obsidian a lot, but very few extra features or plugins. My first impression is that I don’t get what you’re making from the website. Any tool worth using in this space (which I vaguely understand to be using large collections of Markd
78.
by dboon 9mo ago
I’m a DIY (or, less generously and not altogether inaccurately, NIH) type who thinks he could do a good job of smarter context management. But, I have no particular reason to know better than anyone else. Tell me more. What have you seen? W
79.
by dboon 9mo ago
No, it doesn’t.
80.
by dboon 9mo ago
For anyone coming looking for a solution; I peeked around the OC repository, and a few PRs got merged in. Add this to $HOME/.config/opencode/opencode.json: plugin = ["opencode-anthropic-auth"] That is, if that'
81.
by dboon 9mo ago
If you're going to link a repository, you should read it first. That repository is just a couple plugins and community links. Claude Code is, and always has been, completely closed source.
82.
by dboon 9mo ago
Why do you like or dislike Diet Coke? At some point, saying what I think is embarrassing is equivalent to saying why. But, to accept your good faith olive branch, one more go: AI is a space full of grift and real potential. Anthropic's
83.
by dboon 9mo ago
It is embarrassing to restrict an open source tool that is (IMO) a strictly and very superior piece of software from using your model. It is not immoral, like I said, because it's clearly against the ToC; but it's not like OC is s
84.
by dboon 9mo ago
I actually wouldn't be that surprised by this. I'd be more surprised at the OC people folding (not the right word, but you get it) on some pretty heavy ambitions in favor of an acquisition.
85.
by dboon 9mo ago
This is an unusual L for Anthropic. The unfortunate truth is that the engineering in opencode is so far ahead of Claude Code. Obviously, CC is a great tool, but that's more about the magic of the model than the engineering of the CLI.
86.
by dboon 9mo ago
Why are you asking this? Just try it. It takes maybe fifteen minutes of your time. It’s $20. There is no possible argument against $20 or fifteen minutes if the tool has a chance of being even just 10% better. You’ve spent more time typing
87.
by dboon 9mo ago
It’s not. I see this constantly. I use Ghostty and Alacritty and usually am in a tmux session
88.
Patch Posted for Bringing Rock Band 4 Guitar Support to Linux(phoronix.com)
2 points by dboon 9mo ago|0 comments
89.
An uncomfortable discussion about the Debian bug tracker(nibblestew.blogspot.com)
3 points by dboon 9mo ago|0 comments
90.
by dboon 9mo ago
Sometimes it's really hard not to take the bait.

More ›